I never intended to add it. Its crap, its useless. I was just testing the code from my console and then when I moved Monobook.js ==> Common.js I tested that too and I guess I was beaten by Firebug's feature of not clearing the console window after running the code.--~ UltimateSupreme 13:17, June 1, 2013 (UTC)
Question on idle talks
Yeah, thanks for that message, even if it was just an automated one.
I actually do have a question.
How long does a 'talk correspondence' need to be idle for it ti be considered dead?
Re: Not my intention T_T
I know the idea was born from a good place. I don't know if I'm just overreacting As usual but I have this overwhelming feeling that this is going to start another bad fad. One of the reasons why I was so against this is because I knew people would abuse it like this. This is why I prefer the times when we were expressly told that we weren't a democracy.--Cerez365™(talk) 13:29, June 23, 2013 (UTC)
Need help, could you please delete the last image i uploaded? if you can. File name: Chen Taijutsu Mater.PNG. I made a mistake in the file's name, after the image deletion i will upload the image with its name corrected :). Dan.Faulkner (talk) 15:09, July 3, 2013 (UTC)
Re: Mods Group
Hey, just wondering what your opinion is on this forum topic proposal. I'm aware you already posted there, but wanted to see what your opinion is of the idea in general. :) --Speysider Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 17:18, July 9, 2013 (UTC)
- The reasoning for this being proposed was because there was a time yesterday in which no sysop was online and there was continual edit / revert warring occuring that could not be dealt with (it was dealt with by Omnibender, 2 hours later), so having a small group of users who can quickly protect a page until a sysop comes online to stop the warring would make it easier to get the point across that the user should use the talkpage. I will wait until you have read the whole discussion to make the full opinion though :) --Speysider Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 17:39, July 9, 2013 (UTC)
OmegaRasengan is being rude
- This is all I am saying, I am not wishing you were banned, I stated I am surprised that your speculative article creations hasn't resulted a ban. What you are doing is speculating on something we do not know about yet. That is all. --OmegaRasengan (talk) 18:39, July 9, 2013 (UTC)
I need help, please
I was trying to do some minor edits on the new technique that Obito recently used, and they were reverted twice by two different users. I didn't made any intentional vandalism at all and all I did was adding a comma to the Third Hokage's name and removed the space to the end of the sentence with the first reference. Not only that, I even changed offense and defense to that of the British English's offence and defence. I don't know what to do without being blocked or have my edit reverted the third time. I need help, please. All I can do is wait. 02:07, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
It can be seen in []. 02:12, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
I am very sorry. I meant that you can look at the history to see what happened to my edits. I was trying to give you a link to the past and recent edits and the link didn't take me to the right location.02:12, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
I fixed the link now.02:13, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for understanding. But still, I wasn't adding any swear words, I didn't add any speculations, and I didn't even remove the whole text from the article. All I did was in honesty, was removing the unnecessary space between what the Third Hokage said and the reference of when he said it, and changed those the wording of offense and defense to match that of British English in that article, as well as according to what Hiruzen Sarutobi said by adding a comma.02:23, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
I literally don't get what's going on, TheUltimate3. When I did a minor edit without any real signs of vandalism, this happened [], yet when somebody else did it later, there was no reverting the words offence and defence to offense and defense at all. And when I made the next minor edit, this happened again [], and I wasn't even adding any false information. Seelentau and Ten Tailed Fox are responsible for this. I was intent on improving the article, not trying to vandalize it, destroy it or adding speculations on it. 02:41, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
Okay. I fully understand now. I am calming down now. Thank you very much. I am just not too sure now if I can edit articles again without another one of those reverts. 02:44, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
Okay. But would adding a summary would really help the other same users to prove I am simply fixing something??02:47, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
Am I required to add a summary to my edit every time? I shouldn't take it personally in the first place, anyways. Reverts are bound to happen, anyway. I am trying to avoid being blocked in anyway possible. But I am still bound to make mistakes like everybody else.02:56, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the advice. It was really helpful. Not only that, you also helped me with not having to be completely ashamed of my edits and take it too personally.03:01, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
It's just that if I try to justify something regarding my actions, people could easily conceive it as a guilty conscience or assume or speculate as something else. If I try to do anything less than what is accepted, I would be told to not take it personally, calm down, not worry about it, or something else and be criticized for almost anything I have done. It's like I have to pick and use the best approach every single time in any Wiki for the first time so I get or receive none of that or at least minimize it or at best even prevent that from ever happening once or again. I cannot change the past so easily and I can only affect the present and the future. There is only so much I can take as a single person.04:57, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
Chapter 643 scan
Hey Ultimate3, I found a Chinese scan of the next chapter. But I doubt if it's real or not. check it please (Contact) 12:03, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
- I'm the one who has to apologize, sorry if that bothers you and I won't do it again. (Contact) 15:12, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
Can you please weigh in here? I know the discussion is long, but skim through it if you can; there are some important points. At this point, we just need some other opinions as the same users keep tossing it back and forth and, so far, everyone has their own opinions of what's going on. ~ Ten Tailed Fox 01:15, August 21, 2013 (UTC)
- We might want to wait on some of these issues. Mangastream released a statement and said that these early chapter translations are highly unreliable, because they were leaked from a Chinese company who, like Viz, gets the chapters early, and then the scanalators made a hasty, Chinese to Japanese to English translation. Mangastream itself is waiting until tomorrow to release the chapters. It might be wise to wait for the RAWs, or, at the very least, a better translation, to clear the mess up. What say you? ~ Ten Tailed Fox 12:07, August 21, 2013 (UTC)
...I put Hashirama...
Unless I'm mistaken, this isn't the first instance of where two episodes in a row referred to the same character and in both, the image used in the infobox was just the one from the previous episode. I could be wrong, but I vaguely remember such a thing happening before. --Speysider Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 13:19, August 29, 2013 (UTC)