Talk:Simant/Archive 3

Back to page | < User talk:Simant

6,195pages on
this wiki
Add New Page
Add New Page
This page is an archive. Please do not edit this archive, instead try editing the page this archive originated from.

Re: Jutsu Infobox

Shrug/ the field exists for a reason right?..--AlienGamer--Talk (contribs)-- 18:39, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

Well, ya maybe...But well it will inform ppl, which name which we r going by, our structure, etc...And i still think dantman created the field for a reason...And evn in the older format we had it that way..Literal meaning→Kanji→Romanji→eng tv, Viz, etc...--AlienGamer--Talk (contribs)-- 18:43, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

Umm...I'm not that good with references because I save those references for you just you reedit again. Kunoichi101 (talk) 03:34, October 3, 2009 (UTC)Kunoichi101Kunoichi101 (talk) 03:34, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Well, I was doing that, because 'Six Paths of Pain' and 'Deva Path' are listed as jutsu, not as characters. So if someone goes to deva path, and wants to see HIS jutsu he used in the series under his infobox, they will be able to. same with six paths of pain. that make more sense and sound good? or would u rather me revert?--SkyFlicker (talk) 16:55, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

That was for the same reason as well, so users can better see and sort jutsu that are related to the 6 paths of pain, and not to nagato himself. Im basically 'tree'ing it, so that once the parent/child stuff takes effect, it will be easier for people to navigate. Sound good? Or still want just 'Deva Path'?--SkyFlicker (talk) 17:00, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

As I just wrote on his... once this feature of parent/child comes into effect, the 'users' field isnt going to allow the jutsu to be nested correctly. since all of the paths are individually considered jutsu, and the 6 paths are considered jutsu, they need to be nested as jutsu in the 'parent jutsu' field, with 'nagato' being the 'user'--SkyFlicker (talk) 17:06, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Does 'media' need to be filled out for all infoboxes? because if you put 'anime episode xx', seems like people would know it was anime?--SkyFlicker (talk) 19:17, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Sure thing--SkyFlicker (talk) 19:21, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Am I aggrevatin you yet? lol--SkyFlicker (talk) 19:45, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Just trying to help, lol. Goin through them fairly fast, so may miss some stuff--SkyFlicker (talk) 19:56, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Nah, im finding a lot, just goin down the list alphabetically--SkyFlicker (talk) 20:06, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Sure thing--SkyFlicker (talk) 20:39, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Sorry -_-'. I will from now on ^_^.--NejiByakugan360 17:06, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

Image captions

Simant, the infobox already has the ability to do captions. There is actually a reason why the Image param uses a multi-line textbox rather than something simple. The image param accepts multiple images each on it's own line, you can override the default image size by placing a size after a : and you can give the image a caption by putting one after a ;. See it's use on w:c:souleater:Shadow☆Star. So the infobox basically supports multiple images in the same infobox, each with it's own optional custom size and caption. Much more flexible than extra infobox fields. Course most of the time these are not needed, it's better to avoid them if you don't have a reason to use them. ~NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Oct 9, 2009 @ 09:51 (UTC)


OK. Soon I will start and look at the list with episodes and will add pictures where doesn't have or are not good.--Donatelo (talk) 13:58, October 18, 2009 (UTC)

What did you mean by "one is being slow"?
There is another problem. When I tried to upload new version of a picture with high resolution - the uploaded picture is with the old resolution or even the quality of the new picture is the same as the old one => that is why I upload new file and not replacing the old file version. Don't know if you understood me. :)
And what did you mean by "*Poke* File:Sealed Bomb Square Release.JPG, whitespace"? Could you explain it a little bit simpler. :)
I am bothering you a little more than usual - sorry about that.--Donatelo (talk) 22:05, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
Not really. I am trying to get a clear picture, but it doesn't work. In the justu is caught and The Giant Bee. If you didn't like it, delete it. File:Protection of the Eight Trigrams Sixty-Four Palms.JPG.--Donatelo (talk) 22:21, October 30, 2009 (UTC)
Something like this: File:-Protection of the Eight Trigrams Sixty-Four Palms-.JP], File:--Protection of the Eight Trigrams Sixty-Four Palms--.JPG.--Donatelo (talk) 22:32, October 30, 2009 (UTC)
I manage to extract one more frame. File:---Protection of the Eight Trigrams Sixty-Four Palms---.JPG, File:----Protection of the Eight Trigrams Sixty-Four Palms----.JPG.--Donatelo (talk) 23:17, October 30, 2009 (UTC)
Will you see why this new version of picture don't want to change and to be "current"? - File:The Missed Target.JPG And could you tell me what I am doing wrong?--Donatelo (talk) 17:39, November 1, 2009 (UTC)
In the end, I will not upload new version, because there is a difference between file history, episode infobox, and actual image page and I don't like this and maybe the other users as well. I will make new file and recommend the old file for deletion - Not Used. Is that right?--Donatelo (talk) 19:55, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

Titleicons in infobox

Now that I think about it, I had a reason for moving the icons into the infobox. I wanted to start to get rid of all the titleicons because they're just not a good thing to use. Unreliable css, and it completely screws up when the wiki uses sitenotices (and we try to force that to show), they caused some big overlap problems on a page or two. ~NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Oct 24, 2009 @ 04:49 (UTC)

Aye, moving all the icons into the infobox is fine, that's the best context for them. ~NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Oct 24, 2009 @ 17:24 (UTC)
Two icons is fine if it's easier to do than trying to eliminate the extra one, it doesn't hurt much. ~NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Oct 24, 2009 @ 17:34 (UTC)


Is it possible for you to make a "with" feature for the infobox, like (I assume) you did with the Puppet thing? I ask so we can but things were a character used a technique with another character, (Like Naruto and Shion Naruto and Shion's Super Chakra Rasengan, it would be listed as Naruto with Shion and all that jazz).--TheUltimate3 (talk) 00:01, October 25, 2009 (UTC)

That's fine. As long as at some point, it's done and I can stop obsessing over it.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 00:09, October 25, 2009 (UTC)


but (I say because of my sleepy brain, but that might only be an excuse 8D I don't really know right now) I don't know what you're talking about @o@ ~Hakinu (talk | contribs) 21:20, October 26, 2009 (UTC)

Oh! Well, no, it was the entry in Jacce's talk page with the headline "THANK YOU" :) ~Hakinu (talk | contribs) 21:24, October 26, 2009 (UTC)


I did apologize somehow....—This unsigned comment was made by Kunoichi101 (talkcontribs) .

Maintenance: Name

What does that mean--TheUltimate3 (talk) 22:19, October 29, 2009 (UTC)

oh nu-uh you bunny didn't D:

File:Protective 8 trigrams 64 Palms.jpg picture is so hard to get a capture of that i still remember it! bunny no, it's impsossible, at least from my side, to get a better quality'ed version of it. try it yourself D: ~Hakinu (talk | contribs) 22:04, October 30, 2009 (UTC)

Oh, and for the record: I said the 'from my side' thing because alien has the MKV-files of the original episodes. might happen he can get a better one. i'll ask :3 ~Hakinu (talk | contribs) 22:06, October 30, 2009 (UTC)
No, In Dual Audio and MKV format, i have till epi 149. This pic is in 151, so the one I have now has a huge Cartoon Network watermark. Mutant 16‏ seems to have a good source though. Maybe he can help...AlienGamer (userpagetalk) 22:41, October 30, 2009 (UTC)
Btw Simat, the pic that u replaced it with a few mins ago, hardly shows the actual jutsu. In terms of giving a better discription, and reference, the former was better...AlienGamer (userpagetalk) 22:50, October 30, 2009 (UTC)
But that shows the jutsu better, dont you think? It gives anyone reading it, a better idea about the jutsu, than the one being used now..AlienGamer (userpagetalk) 22:58, October 30, 2009 (UTC)
K..AlienGamer (userpagetalk) 23:00, October 30, 2009 (UTC)


Sorry about that... Kunoichi101 (talk) 02:32, November 3, 2009 (UTC)Kunoichi101Kunoichi101 (talk) 02:32, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Rasengan

I don't real care, I was just trying to help Dekoshu. Jacce | Talk 18:02, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Naruto Transformation Page protection

Omnibender gave him/her a warning and the files has been protected. Jacce | Talk 10:07, November 8, 2009 (UTC)

Why I added Fierce Dragon Palm

I added it because it was part of Naruto Path of the Ninja 2.

Mostly a guess

It was mostly a guess, pretty much a guess that measures the extent of it.--Jako98146 (talk) 03:22, November 14, 2009 (UTC)

Ok Then

It was a fake rank anyway.--Jako98146 (talk) 15:37, November 14, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Flying Tool

I dont't want to get angry you, but on this wiki admins are as dictators. If they don't like an edit, they undo it. On wikipedia is not as here. There admins are honest.--Looc (talk) 20:31, November 15, 2009 (UTC)


Why you keep changing my talk page. —This unsigned comment was made by Animefreak 55 (talkcontribs) on 22:24, November 16, 2009.

Revert Wars

My apologies. I'm assuming you were the one that undid my stuff on the Kisame page. I was still editing the page when you undid it, so I didn't notice until afterwards. You undid it again, so it doesn't matter anymore. Cidem1324 | Talk (UTC)


Your right, but I think we should change the owner to unknown or something.--Narutouz7 (talk) 17:52, November 21, 2009 (UTC)


hello simant my name is mummiesofdeath i like your work would like to see mine . [[[1]]] [book]

Lava Jutsu

That person was right it was chapter 466. Proof right here, (talk) 04:56, November 28, 2009 (UTC)

Nevermind I saw that she used it in 465.Saimaroimaru (talk) 04:59, November 28, 2009 (UTC)

Don't get snappy with me. Wi went back and checked and saw my mistake and even commented that I was wrong before your comment. I never said I was right, I said the user was right even though I found out that was wrong. How about stop taking offense to what i say and just prove me wrong(already done) and move on. So what if two other editors disagreed with it, neither of you are perfect, its was an editing mistake now move on or are going to make this more than it really is? Good day.Saimaroimaru (talk) 05:02, November 28, 2009 (UTC)

Just letting you know they decided I was right and you were wrong, just because you teo agree on something doesn't mean anything, have a nice day.Saimaroimaru (talk) 05:11, December 1, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Toads

You can move it. Jacce | Talk 19:05, December 1, 2009 (UTC)

Also on Fandom

Random Wiki