Wikia

Narutopedia

Raikaze

8 Edits since joining this wiki
May 1, 2008

Raikaze, TheUltimate3 already did give a warning. In the history where he reverted your edits.

"Giving you a fair warning this time Raikyouken. Do NOT add this to the talk page again. In fact, don't add it to the article. Its to long as it is."
That content is full of original research, and doesn't add anything to any article on the wiki. The wiki is not a place for fanfics, or writing your own articles outside of what goes in the actual wiki's articles.

Please stop creating new accounts, it's called sockpuppeting and is a form of ban evasion, which is in itself a reason to ban someone. ~NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) current discussion May 1, 2008 @ 20:33 (UTC)

It wasn't that it was a fanfic, I know it's not. I was just listing a blanket of things that don't belong on the wiki. The issue was that the wiki does not need a huge section on naruto and relationships. That kind of thing is always full of POV. And a wiki is supposed to be neutral to that.
The wiki isn't for opinions, quite the opposite. The point of making things open is to allow editors to contribute facts and improvements to the articles, and create valid new ones. When an article has POV, it's supposed to be neutralized, adding other POV isn't the point.
Fanfics, POV articles, and things you write yourself is the point of the Naruto Fanon Wiki, not the Narutopedia. ~NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) current discussion May 1, 2008 @ 22:49 (UTC)

Re: Ok, What!

Hello there. Anyway. In response to your message, yeah the additions you kept attempting to add was not bad. It was surprisingly well written. The problem? For the most part it is a persons analysis on what he's seen in the show. Therefore it counts as Original Research. Which in obvious no-no. And I'm already ignoring the the PoV aspect of it as Dant has already refereed to.--TheUltimate3 01:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

No. Though it would be a start. Anywho, what is allowed is non-biased, factual reporting. Like I said before, the overly large analysis on Sakura, Hinata, and Haku (o.O) was for as I said for the most part whatever your head thought off, but down in analysis form in the talk page, which constituted Original Research. Even if you read the manga, putting that in would still count as original research.
Facts about RaikazeRDF feed

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki