We do hope that you will stay for a long time. Enjoy your stay as we work to become the best Naruto info site out there. BELIEVE IT!
If you're looking for something to do why not look over the Forums or more specifically Narutopedia Collaboration for a list of projects we're working on. And the Community portal has a lot of recent discussions and places to go listed on it.
It is not specified that there weren't any other mizukage between the 4th and her.
New releases are recognized on this wiki the Friday of when it is released, regardless of when it was actually released overseas.
Re: smart one
I don't have to put something on myself, when I can just edit the incoherent additions typical annons put up to make them readable and in Wiki style. Point is however, as Jacce said, rules iz rules.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 14:44, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
Jutsu Page Creation
- It is unnecessary to include Category:Jutsu at the bottom of jutsu pages, the infobox does that on its own. Simant (talk) 03:22, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
- It is also unnecessary to add category characters, while using the character infobox. Simant (talk) 03:34, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
Re: I apologize
Being apart of a clan...
An administrator is currently fitting your images into the articles so I will oppose no further on this matter. I also ask for your forgiveness, I am rather sensitive to editing on the articles concerning the five basic natures. User:Master Shannara December 16, 2009
- Crystal was long ago agreed to be part Earth in past discussions, hence why it is listed as being part Earth in the nature transformation page. I listed Guren with Earth because of that, to uphold consistency of information between articles. As you can see from the time I added Earth nature to her page and the message I left in her talk page, there was more than enough time for anyone who disagreed with it to step forward. No one did, not a person voiced opposition, so I went ahead and changed it. If you don't like it, convince the rest of the community not to consider Crystal Release as part Earth and I'll remove that from her page, but for now, consistency between articles is all I care about. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 18:00, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
naruto shippuden kizuna drive
ino was confirmed along with shikamaru on silliconera as stated as ino being as recovery and shikamaru being a support role
ino and shikamaru in naruto kazuna drive
type in naruto shippuden ultimate ninja storm 2 on google then go to the one that has silliconera then look for yourself.
Re: Jutsu Translation
Just give me a link to a high-quality video where the name can be seen and the time index of when the name can be seen in the video and I'll be happy to help you. --ShounenSuki (talk | contribs) 18:29, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
- I did all those techniques. If you have any more, just drop me a note. There were a few moves in that one video that weren't in the list you gave me and I saw several videos with moves that weren't in that one video. --ShounenSuki (talk | contribs) 22:16, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
Ultimate Ninja Storm
Are you aware that Ultimate Ninja Storm, despite being an English game, gives Japanese names for its jutsu? The Japanese (or literal English) should be used for jutsu article titles, not the English translations. ~SnapperTo 18:56, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
Multiple Shadow Clone Rasengan
Hang a bit before changing the caps back, there was a massive moving by Snapper which sparked a discussion on how we do some stuff, please give input at Forum:Title Case. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 23:36, April 19, 2010 (UTC)
I dont know that Ibiki named it. If he did it, put the romaji or at least the English name when you create the page, because if you dont do it, it looks like an unamed technique.--Kind-Hearted-One (talk) 13:07, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
I'm getting the feeling you still don't understand how to make character pages with the infobox properly. - SimAnt 16:29, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
Did you find any source saying that Kuroma and Akari's names actually had the clan name in them? That was the reason they were moved from the names you moved them to back to the ones you moved them from in the past, without the clan name. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 18:25, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
Orochimaru Mud Body
Living Wall Fist: Style One
You're not being able to move the page because it already exists as a redirect to Living Wall Fist. Normally, that wouldn't be a problem (I think), but when a redirect has an edit history, or wasn't created by an article being moved, you have to delete it first, so the "new" article can have the edit history of the other article that is being moved to the new title. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 03:22, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, you might want to have a sysop do that, this way you preserve the editing history of the article. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 03:42, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
Episode 196 Title
Sorry about the incorrect translation. You see, I was in a rush to school and I have all the episodes' translations on a file on my computer. In the hurry I was in, I copied the wrong translation, so again, I apologize. ~ Fmakck - Talk - Contributions 23:44, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Found it ten minutes after leaving you this. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 02:01, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
I am not the one who creates the pages. I wasn't the user who originally added the deletion tag. If you want it to stay, use talk page so others can give their opinion. I personally don't think it is necessary, as it can simply be mentioned in the hydrification technique article instead of creating another unnamed jutsu article.—This unsigned comment was made by Deva 27 (talk • contribs) .
Rushing on creating
I understand your point, particularly on Cerez365, who is in my opinion the most active member of the wikia, always doing something, always here when i check in. I also used to be a little annoyed but, this is a community and we are all trying to achieve the same goal.--Vecanoi (talk) 18:06, September 28, 2011 (UTC)
In regards to characters from ch. 305
I saw that you had edited the page of Unmo Samidare and I was wondering if you planned to add the two other deceased nin from the same chapter (305) on page 10 panel 3 on a later date? Should be possible since we can clearly see their names spelled over their pictures.
Re: Tobi article
Oh, I'm sorry then. The way it was written though made it sound like it all happened with Tobi in the treetops. Next time you can simply edit the article, there's no need to leave a message on my talkpage for something like this.
Best Regards,Cerez365™ 20:12, November 30, 2011 (UTC)
- I guess so.--OmegaRasengan (talk) 03:14, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
Link Mei Terumi
Rock Lee no Seishun Full-Power Ninden
Could you please explain to me why it's strange that a spin-off series takes place in a different setting than the one currently in the original? Neither manga is affiliated with the other except through the fact that they share the same characters.--Cerez365™ 10:50, January 10, 2012 (UTC)
Flying Thunder God Technique trivia
Uhm. I removed the trivia point simply because it's not necessary. Minato's whole fighting style (in the games as well as the manga and anime) revolves around him using the Flying Thunder God Technique (hence the name) and then attacking persons — which might be one of the reasons the Rasengan doesn't require the use of hand seals. Why does something that obvious need to be mentioned in the article?
As for the whole top dog bit and your caps lock rave, it's taking every ounce of restraint I possess not to address that, so please try to act/respond more civilly. Thanks in advance.--Cerez365™ 00:27, March 12, 2012 (UTC)
Naruto 6: Road to Ninja
Hi Omega, how do you do? I'd like to ask you where did you watch the second trailer of the movie? I didn't find it at all, even the official website of this movie hasn't released it. Thanks for your help ^__^ Shakhmoot (Talk) 19:02, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
Re: No life
It's really taking every ounce of self-restraint I have in this attempt not to be rude to you:
- First of all what edit are you referring to? I haven't undone any of your edits in a while. I made the conscious decision not to do that for some time now. You might want to go and check who it was that undid your edit.
- Where I am for whatever portion of a day/my time is none of your concern since I am not bonded to you.
- It's only because you think I'm high and mighty why I am. Try thinking of me as below you and all that will change.
- If Deva's just like me, then he must be a lovely individual.
- I am not a dictator, I'm a Gemini.
I get the fact that you don't like me or what have view since you feel I dog your edits. While that's fine and all I will ask you to kindly stop being an ass and act as though you're an independent component of the wikia instead of part of a community. People are saying they're unsure of how to proceed with things and you go right on ahead and start replacing Tobi with Obito in jutsu articles. Is it that you don't have access to Special:WikiActivity like the rest of us or something? --Cerez365™(talk) 14:03, August 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Same...Please don't replace Tobi with Obito and wait till our discussion is over...You may well respond to us in the forum created by Cerez. akz! 14:05, August 29, 2012 (UTC)
Maybe I wouldn't be an ass if you STOP ACTING like something YOU'RE NOT and quit stalking my edits now would I? Notice how majorly you are the only one to undo my edits? Some others don't seem to have an issue with my edits but most edits you see that aren't yours is useless. And I know you two are responding to me because you two don't want anyone to beat you to the punch and I know both of you are going to hurry on and change everything before someone else does once this is over because you two always have to hurry to make an edit before someone beats you to it. --OmegaRasengan (talk) 14:28, August 29, 2012 (UTC)
- It's funny the way you expect people to take you seriously. You constantly have a problem with anyone who troubles your edit in one way or another. You used to complain about the same thing with Deva and Omni like a deranged person. Now you're lumping Aditya in with me as well. Omega, if you want more to do on the wiki, all you have to do is ask, or lead the charge. Pointing fingers has gotten you nowhere thus far, you need to come with a new strategy. God knows I'd die if someone beats me to an edit. I would just whilt and die...--Cerez365™(talk)14:36, August 29, 2012 (UTC)
- I could care less if Omni and everyone else undo my edits. Know why? Cuz they act like you and Deva who did it to feel superior and like Aditya making adding new stuff like a race. And since when did I complain about Omni messing with my edits? --OmegaRasengan (talk) 14:50, August 29, 2012 (UTC)
hayate revived what?
Hi Omega and how are you? I wonder where did you get all the information about the story of this coming filler arc. I saw the promotion video (PV) of this arc about a week ago on its official website. but I haven't found a subbed version of it. —Shakhmoot (Talk) 20:19, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks so much for the link and I watched it and understand the story of this arc in general. I have a page which talks about the arc and the main characters that will make their appearance on it. —Shakhmoot (Talk) 20:38, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
You may want to see Help:Common image pages.—
You need to clear your cache.—
Re: We do form style, not infobox!
- i don't know who did this, but it'll mess up if using edit form. Kunoichi101 (talk) 21:57, January 21, 2013 (UTC)Kunoichi101
I'm sorry if i offended you, but it's quite clear that you and Cerez-shi have something of a history, i was simply stating that you don't seem to get along with him. I never said that i know everything about you two's history with each other, all i know is that you two never really seem to get along very well. There is no need for you to insult me, as i have said before i did not mean to offend you. Again, i am sorry if i offended you.184.108.40.206 (talk) 06:36, January 30, 2013 (UTC) Yomiko-chan
Please stop interpreting every modification, reversion, or proposed deletion of your edits as other users' personal missions to get under your skin. This wiki has maybe 10 regular editors - yourself included - at any one time, so it is inevitable that you will have a "bad" experience with every other editor more than once.
If you feel that you are butting heads with someone else an inordinate number of times, consider the possibility that a) the two of you are the only editors active at the time(s) of day you tend to edit, or b) the other editor is not knowingly modifying, reverting, or proposing the deletion of one of your edits. Even if you do not believe that either option is the case, pretend that it is. In short, assume good faith.
If you do not feel it is possible to assume good faith with someone, please contact either myself or another sysop with your concerns. Taking it upon yourself and calling out others for every perceived attack makes the wiki a toxic editing environment for everyone. ~SnapperTo 21:58, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Again, this wiki does not have very many editors. It also does not, in a single day, have very many edits. This means that a person who peruses Special:RecentChanges once or twice a day is going to cross paths with most other people a half-a-dozen times per week. That Cerez, and Deva before him, tends to disagree with your edits is a matter of different opinions and not any kind of concerted effort to "stalk" you.
- Because I really don't see a sign that Cerez is going out of his way to undermine all of your contributions. First consider the frequency of both of your edits: Cerez has edited 500 times in the last two weeks; you have edited 500 times in the last three months. If we assume that his editing rate is consistent, he has made 3000 edits in the time that you have made those 500. That gives him a minimum of 2500 edits that had nothing to do with you.
- But maybe you're right and those remaining 500 edits were predominately focused on reverting you. If you have some diffs or links to where he is doing that, I'd like to see them, because in a cursory glance over your recent edits I'm not seeing any unusual presence of Cerez:
- There's this edit, where you reverted an edit he made two weeks before, which itself could be called a revert of an edit you made over a year ago. I sort of doubt he knew that was something you had added, given the time in between edits.
- There's this edit, where you accuse Cerez of rewriting your edit. But that doesn't seem to be what he did; yes, he did reword part of a section that you originally added, but most of the alterations to your original edit were made by an IP. In fact, the only things Cerez altered were what the IP added.
- There's this edit, where you reverted Cerez's removal of a section you added. While you were correct that Omnibender agreed with you on the talk page, Norleon, Elveonora, and possibly Aged Goblin agreed with Cerez at the time that he removed the section. So he had a simple majority in favor of his edit. Soon after he removed it additional evidence was provided and Cerez acknowledged his mistake, but at the time his actions do not appear to have been motivated by you.
- There's this edit, where you reverted Cerez's removal of an image you added. I don't see a reason for it, so maybe he did remove it just to get at you.
- To review, of your last 500 edits, I only see evidence that Cerez has gone out of his way to defy you 1 time. Put another way, he reverts 0.2% of your edits. If we pretend that the other three examples were also made because Cerez has personal issues with you, then that's still only 0.8% of your edits that he's reverting. That's not the kind of wantonness one would expect from a stalker.
- It's very possible that I've missed some examples since I was only looking for times you mentioned Cerez in your edit summary. Please provide me the links so that I can have a more informed opinion. ~SnapperTo 00:59, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
Do not create manga chapter articles this early as the wiki doesn't recognise a new manga chapter release until Thursday/Friday. --Speysider Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 07:52, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
- The policy says that it doesn't recognize it until the spoiler is released in manga format. Its on MangaHere in manga format. He had every right to create the page. ~ Ten Tailed Fox 07:59, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
Re: Rotating Blades Japanese name
Re: Spoilt brat...
- I never called you a spoiled brat, I called you a dimwit because you behave like one. You do the same thing with every regular content editor which is why I'm disappointed in myself for even answering you. Then you proceed to rant and rave that people are acting superior to you: understand when you are wrong or misguided. Don't you get tired of the same cycle with a different person all the time?
- As I said before argue your points on merit: give reasons why it should stay and or is needed. I was not the one to tag your article for deletion, but I do share their sentiments. Who knows, I may be wrong and the community may feel otherwise.
- I can't help it if you can't stand me OmegaRasengan, but that doesn't mean I'm going to ignore the things you do on the wikia that I don't agree with and I wouldn't expect you to do that either...--Cerez365™(talk) 07:38, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
I don't know what you mean by "that thing he does", so I'll pretend it's his habit of "Oh lordy lordy, I grew up w/ the internet and that is kewl
b(^-^)b HELLER!" And yes, that is kind of annoying. ~SnapperTo 08:23, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
- Um, he was talking about Cerez-shi's habit of "Heller! Lordy lordy! I grew up with the internet" thing.--Yomiko-chan (talk) 09:20, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
Video Game techniques
Where are you getting those names for the video game techniques you're creating? The only place I ever found names for techniques of UNSG was a walkthrough at gamefaqs. There's a forum topic I created here name video game jutsu overhaul or something like that, where I'm putting what I can translate from video game technique names I found through the internet. I'm also leaving there links to sources where you can see what each technique does, so there's a way to actually describe them. I'm just waiting until Seelentau goes through them. Currently, there's only Ultimate Ninja 1 there, but I already finished translating UN2, and I'll post that with UN3 when I'm finished with UN3. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 01:44, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
Re: Recent scan
Storm 3 Playable Characters
- Just want to say great job putting all the information in Storm 3, you've been a good help. Another thing is I need an opinion from someone and since I don't think Omnibender wants to hear me right now, and since your the one putting in all the confirmed characters and info, do you think we should put in the PTS characters since other people disagree it was a fake or something.--Droidkaju (talk) 14:31, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
Madara's voice actor
While I appreciate you leaving youtube links as sources for articles you make, in the case of today's tailed beast jutsu articles, the video is really long. I don't know if you're aware of it, but if you use youtube's share feature, you can create a link that'll take whoever clicks it directly to the specified time frame. If the video is long like that one you put, I think that would be useful. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 01:44, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
Where exactly did you get the name? Going by the description you put and comparing with this, and then this, that technique is bound to be Shadow Clone Technique, Naruto Combo or Harem Technique. Comparing it to another guide also puts the debut in UN1. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 23:14, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Then why did you put its debut as UN2? I'm still gathering all I can find on video game techniques from the UN series. When articles finally start showing up, we can probably point out in a trivia section that the technique name changed between games. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 01:23, March 11, 2013 (UTC)
The user you do not like lol
- because both are immature kids that prefer to bitch about each other anytime they meet instead of just ignoring each other or come to a truce/compromise. It happens with many editors on this wiki too, just take speysider or X29 as prime examples. And, from what I can see until now, you, Jean Daichou, will be targeted as well sooner or later since you are too young in the eyes of many editors here to be of any value for this wiki. Better watch out, you will shortly realise that this wiki is in fact a hostile place. Didn't actually wanted to butt in like this, but it had to be said sooner or later.220.127.116.11 (talk) 19:42, March 21, 2013 (UTC)
Who said you had to? And are you the same annoymous user that keeps trying to make a beef with me? If you wanted to tell him this you could have just told him on his talk page. Yes Jean, what he said was true though Cerez is in denial about it. When he first started editting here, he developed a superior editting attitude and started reverting or creating edit wars of edits he thought weren't worthy and I was usually his target. If I ever participated in an discussion, he would be the one to be on the opposite side. I agree and sort of disagree what the annoymous user said about us being immature. Since the last fight we had, I started not getting furious if Cerez participated in a discussion I was involved in but I get a feeling he's intentionally baiting me when he keeps spelling my username wrong (how mature is that?). I surely hope that this doesn't continue again in the future, the fighting I mean. --OmegaRasengan (talk) 20:16, March 21, 2013 (UTC)
I sort of agree omegarasengan-chan he does like to have his signature on a lot of things and he does like to edit and change things which we have corrected (how selfish) anyway I understand now --Jean DaichouLoves Naruto 20:21, March 21, 2013 (UTC)
- well no, I am not the user who tries to make a beef with you and I also apologise for calling you a kid, I got a little carried away. Why I had to though is that it was just a good chance to do so. Just imagine I would make a forum blog about "hey guys I dislike the ways certain users are treated, even when I am not affected by it". do you really think anyone would care? Just look at speysider's attempt to state his mind recently, it was smashed like an interloping attack. For what I can say right now is that the thing I wrote partly disburdened me a bit even though I now it won't change nothing. I now this wiki good enough to know the constant fighting about minor issues will go on forever, it is for that reason I am ignoring my account any further and will go on as an anonymous user since it actually reduces the trouble since nobody takes one serious enough to spend more time bitching about him.18.104.22.168 (talk) 20:32, March 21, 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, I'm not part of this conversation, but I am just curious: is 22.214.171.124 trying to act like he is OmegaRasengan but actually is not? I will not accept any answer except by OmegaRasengan himself in this case, seeing as how others would not know. Also, OmegaRasengan, it isn't "annoymous" it's "anonymous". Not a big deal but just telling you. Also, 126.96.36.199 cannot spell "know". He thinks it's "now". Yep. Adam10003 (talk) 20:44, March 21, 2013 (UTC)
Oh. I'm typing from my phone and the spell check is dreadful. And that speysider...his fighting with Ten-Tailed Fox is completely more ridiculous than the fights me and Cerez have had. Though with X29, eh he does tend to act all G-rated all the time and can't handle cursing. Speysider constantly tries to find a reason or loophole to prove TTF is wrong about something and he's a sysop! Ridiculousness. And no Adam, we are not the same person. --OmegaRasengan (talk) 20:53, March 21, 2013 (UTC)
- While I usually enjoy a good circle of hate, I do find it is my duty to remind everyone this is supposed to be a friendly "work" environment and that if people have beef with anyone it is best interest of everyone to either take the high ground and let it go or take it to the actual person. Otherwise this turns into a high school level "talk behind ones back" sort of thing which is detrimental, especially if it is done in a place where everyone can very easily see.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 20:57, March 21, 2013 (UTC)
- @adam well omega answered already, we are not the same person (a soliloquy to draw in attention would be more than pathetic). Also thank you for the very constructive review, "now" and "know"...I always get those wrong! Know it's the time I now it better, thanks to you!
- @TheUltimate I can't share youre liking in cirles of hate, exept you've meant it ironical. Anyway, the high ground you've mentioned is a convenient place to be until it is cannonades by another pointless fight like the one omega mentioned where everybody can't cool themselves and jumps in just to start the old story over and over again.188.8.131.52 (talk) 21:14, March 21, 2013 (UTC)
::OmegaRasengan, please do not attempt to sound as if you know exactly the reason as to why me and TTF get into arguments, there are reasons for it, none of which I am at liberty to tell you and none of which concern you. These stupid discussions need to stop, they don't help the wiki. --Speysider Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 21:20, March 21, 2013 (UTC)
- as I've said, hostile place. It just gives people the opportunity, and hey, who could've guessed, everybody jumps in. a conversation is good when different opinions clash but this wiki takes it way too often way too far. How is all this related to the Naruto series anymore?184.108.40.206 (talk) 21:33, March 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Speysider - The only thing I'm going to say and will not continue discussing further with you about this, I am not asking about your history nor am I acting like I know your squabbles and try to offend you. I said what I said because you gave off that vibe. Just because someone or some people are talking about something you don't want to hear or accept does not make the talks stupid (however, other than the things said about you, this is becoming ridiculous). And thinking that way sounds sort of childish. Plus this is a user talk page, not a regular talk page on improving a Naruto article.
- Ultimate - I'm not baiting him (if I am, then it was unintentional). I was saying what I thought and what he makes them look like.
- Elveonora - This is a user talk page so??
This is getting out of hand and I was just answering questions at first so let's stop this hate talk huh? --OmegaRasengan (talk) 21:54, March 21, 2013 (UTC)
FairyTail Fanon wiki
Hey could you please join FairyTaill Fanon wiki please, It's new and I need Admins who can develop the wiki really well please join--09:21, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
It's too early to create the new episode article . So please don't create the article or episode pages before they are available/released. Even if the title is available. It breaches the spoiler policy. Thanks —Shakhmoot (Talk) 09:40, April 4, 2013 (UTC)