Wikia

Narutopedia

KazeKitsune

aka Rebecca

7,546 Edits since joining this wiki
July 4, 2008
(Difference between revisions) | User:KazeKitsune
Line 78: Line 78:
 
Hi I'm a NaruSaku fan and you're a NaruHina fan.you wanna debate?if not I'll leave you alone.
 
Hi I'm a NaruSaku fan and you're a NaruHina fan.you wanna debate?if not I'll leave you alone.
 
--[[User:Kyuzo Hatake|K.Hatake]] ([[User talk:Kyuzo Hatake|talk]]) 12:36, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Kyuzo Hatake|K.Hatake]] ([[User talk:Kyuzo Hatake|talk]]) 12:36, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
  +
  +
==Re: Thank you==
  +
No problem. :) -[[User:White Flash|<span style="font-family: Papyrus; color: #B0C4DE;">'''''White Flash'''''</span>]]-[[User talk:White Flash|<span style="font-size:90%; font-family: Papyrus; color: #B0C4DE">(Talk)</span>]]- 01:56, March 18, 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:56, March 18, 2012

Icon-Archive
Archives

According to the Databook

You use this as an headline. Can you specify what databook it is, please? ^_^ ~Hakinu (talk | contribs) 10:22, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Your Page

U'r not supposed to delete ANY msg's frm u'r talkpage....Read our Talkpage policy...If u'r talkpage is getting too big, just archive it...-- AlienGamer--Talk-- 06:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Manda

May I ask what your source is for manda being 100 meters tall. [1]. Simant (talk) 00:17, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

Beasts order of capture

why is it you will not let me post the information i have on the beasts order of capture?—This unsigned comment was made by 75.120.114.105 (talkcontribs) .

Tobirama

All you did was rearrange the order of trivia for his page. Was that honestly necessary? You did not even add anything to the page.—This unsigned comment was made by Kagutsuchi100 (talkcontribs) .

Madara article

Thank you for the corrections you made.Wreiad (talk) 07:49, July 27, 2010 (UTC)

Arc

According to the manual of style, arc headlines should be written "Some Named arc" not "Some Named Arc". Jacce | Talk | Contributions 19:29, July 28, 2010 (UTC)

Then just wait and see if the manual is changed. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:31, July 29, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Tailed beasts image

Wiki has a good thumb system, so high quality images can be used. Plus, according to the image policy, an image is only to be replaced if a similar one with both higher quality and similar licensing can be uploaded. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 22:25, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

I think you should bring the topic up in the talk page before making any changes. I don't think it'll go anywhere, since png images are preferred over jpg images. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 16:42, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Unable to edit

I know you didn't ask me, but this might be faster than waiting for TheUltimate3.

Are you still an autoconfirmed user? Check Preferences → User profile → Member of groups or see if it says "Your e-mail address was authenticated on X" under E-mail. If you're not, try a new email. If you are, try a new email anyway. If neither works, you'd probably need to ask User:Dantman. ~SnapperTo 19:33, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

Redirects' Deletion

Why are you tagging redirect pages for deletion? ~ Fmakck© (Images|contribs) 21:12, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

I only see one redirect you tagged is misspelled: "Nine tail fox" and the others you've tagged are common spellings of the pages they direct to. ~ Fmakck© (Images|contribs) 21:19, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
So? naruto redirects to Naruto Uzumaki. That doesn't mean the "naruto" page should be deleted. ~ Fmakck© (Images|contribs) 21:24, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

I don't think any of the pages you tagged should be deleted. There's a lot of times i just type "Naruto" and get redirected to the article.--Cerez™☺ 21:28, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

I normally don't worry about capitalization when I search for an articule. I've type "Nine tail fox" many a times, in addition to that. We should keep it easy to use, not make it more difficult, even if only by a little.Ryne 91 (talk) 21:31, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Source

Would you mind sourcing this? We have no idea where you got this from. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 23:18, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

Kurama and Nine-Tails

Not every instance of "the Nine-Tails" has to be changed to Kurama you know? You can leave it as Nine-Tails, this isn't a Tobi and Madara situation where the terms no longer apply to the same character. Sometimes leaving it as Nine-Tails gives the text a better flow. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 20:07, January 26, 2012 (UTC)

This though... Why are you trying to erase every instance of the beasts being called "X-Tails"?--Cerez365Hyūga Symbol 00:25, February 14, 2012 (UTC)

Yes, but at the same time, are you not replacing all the X-Tails with their proper names O.o?--Cerez365Hyūga Symbol 08:21, February 14, 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed Facts

You do realize that my edits were just stating canon fact on Naruto's page right? Even the extra filler detail I put concerning episode 235 was exactly what he said. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean you should erase just because it bothers you. Romance Girl (talk) 07:07, March 13, 2012 (UTC)Romance Girl

Again, what I put on Sakura's page was true too. That information that was put before was false as it was never straight out confirmed. You do realize that I'm just going to keep doing this until you give me proof that this was confirmed, right? Even if you don't respond, I am still going to be doing this. Whether you hate Sakura, Naruto, are the fact that Naruto/Sakura pairing is likely, it is no reason for your own personal preference to get in the way of true facts. Romance Girl (talk) 07:19, March 13, 2012 (UTC)Romance Girl

I don't really care about shipping, but what it bothers me to no end is that every time you edit something on a character's personality section, it always creates a back and forth mini-edit war. You don't have to add every single detail ever mentioned about them in their personality section. It's not a shipping section, and you always go to make it more convoluted, changing words that don't need to me changed and what not. Bottom line: in my opinion, you're creating an unnecessary burden. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 00:13, March 14, 2012 (UTC)

This was aimed at RomaceGirl, not you KazeKitsune. I should have been clearer. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 01:32, March 14, 2012 (UTC)

A slight apology is in order from me KazeKitsune. I am sorry for accusing you of pairing preference but didn't help that you were ingnoring my messages. I would have liked to see why you were erasing me edits but you weren't explaining exactly which is why I got frustrated. You are correct though. I am a NaruSaku fan but I personally don't believe I'm showing pairing preference here. It was confirmed in the Third Databook and yes it is outdated but why should we believe that changed? It was never outright stated Sakura has figured out her feelings, only that she still loved Sasuke. That is a confirmed fact. But explictly stating that "Sakura does not reciporcate" is pairing bias as that really was never confirmed. Please don't ignore this message. I would like to reach a compromise. Romance Girl (talk) 07:08, March 17, 2012 (UTC)Romance Girl

True Sakura's feelings for Sasuke were confirmed in chapter 540 and Hinata's feelings were brought up as well. All of that is true. But still...do we have proof that Sakura has figured out her feelings for Naruto and that they are definitely platonic? As far as my memory serves, it was never stated outright that Sakura figured out her feelings in the manner that it was for Sasuke and Hinata's feelings reaffirmed but if it was please tell me. Sakura loves Sasuke yes but Naruto? We still aren't exactly sure so it would seem the Third Databook still stands. As far as what I've seen, Sakura still seems to be confused her confession a notable example but that's my opinon. As for it being a platonic relationship, not really for Naruto is in love with Sakura so platonic is gone right there and Sakura has shown hints of feeling the same(The Hug, Feeding Scene, Unfinished sentence or whole Tenci Bridge Arc.) but on Sakura, that's my opinion. I could be wrong. Romance Girl (talk) 08:41, March 17, 2012 (UTC)Romance Girl

True. What my opinion is like I said, my opinion. And like you said, what Yamato and Sai have said are from their point of view. Sai isn't the best at emotions which is also true as well but Naruto's feelings were indirectly by him confirmed to be love which I believe because he seems so selfless when it comes to Sakura's feelings so I don't see that as a crush really. Maybe at first but not anymore. Love does have different forms, Sakura's was a obsession for sure(Maybe not anymore but it seemed like it to me in Part 1. Maybe it was geniune love but was poorly shown.), Naruto's love seems geniune, and Hinata's well... I guess its geniune as well but seemed obsessive in the Anime version. Just the way they portrayed it but that's the anime. See, Naruto being in love with Sakura would make sense since they hang out together a lot so it wouldn't be illogical. I see Hinata's feelings as illogical since she doesn't know him very well and her love for him almost seems like admiration which she sees as love but that's just me. The feeding scene may have implied romance because feeding is seen in Japan as romantic(see Naruto's reaction for proof.) and same with the hug. That's a public display of affection which Japanese people seem against(See the crowd's blushing in the background in that panel. Even Kakashi, who rarely shows emotion, was blushing.) I see the hug as holding undeniable romantic undertones. The way I see it, it seems Sakura loves Naruto but isn't aware of it and thinks she loves Sasuke but that's what I believe. I am sorry for almost seeming to be debating with you about couple likelihood. I always end up doing that ^_^. Romance Girl (talk) 09:27, March 17, 2012 (UTC)Template:NaruSaku fan

Hi I'm a NaruSaku fan and you're a NaruHina fan.you wanna debate?if not I'll leave you alone. --K.Hatake (talk) 12:36, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Thank you

No problem. :) -White Flash-(Talk)- 01:56, March 18, 2012 (UTC)

Facts about KazeKitsuneRDF feed

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki