aka Windy

Chat moderator
12,841 Edits since joining this wiki
September 1, 2011
  • I am Male

Re: Naruto and COAT

He used YYR, not Coat, according to Suzaku's translation. • Seelentau 愛 17:47, February 21, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Deletions

I figured that having a "X (disambiguation)" redirect wouldn't be as effective as just a "X" redirect. I was going to redirect "Team Ten" to that disambiguation page, but it already redirects to "Team Asuma". Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 21:26, February 22, 2015 (UTC)

re: filter

I'll poke UltimateSupreme to update the filter to exclude rollbacks. :) --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 09:02, February 24, 2015 (UTC)

The filter has been updated :)
Regarding the colours, it's like that for everyone. We are part of some private test for feedback purposes.
I agree that it is very annoying, so please leave feedback about it here (I see you left a bit of feedback). --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 21:01, February 24, 2015 (UTC)

U. Gi. O.

Basically, what happened is that notification rules were violated, but, others made excuses to list it like that from now on. I was contacted by the head of the wiki for reverting the edits and I said that making an excuse for a one-time thing is not worth it, he didn't like what I had to say about it and threatened to ban me if I don't stop reverting the unneeded edit. I noted him that threats about banning for no reason aren't scary to me and he banned me for harassing him, which I clearly did not do. After a month I dared him to ban me again (yes, it was ballzy of me) and he did it indefinitely. Sorry if this message is long, If you were interested you could've just asked sooner.. I promise this won't in any way interfere with my edits here.--Omojuze (talk) 11:09, February 25, 2015 (UTC)


lol. That made me laugh ;) --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 15:25, February 25, 2015 (UTC)

part 1 filler ?

Can I ask what the source is for changing every one of the filler arcs in part 1? --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 10:48, February 26, 2015 (UTC)

He gives no source for where he found that data. And I don't think he was inviting any user to go and actually change it either. Especially as you can see that the link was pointing to the wiki's title, with different display text. For all we know, that might not even be the official names, since some of them don't make sense at all. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 18:30, February 26, 2015 (UTC)
I can't even remember the source he gave. I know you want to be consistent, even I want consistency, but... yeah. :P --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 18:46, February 26, 2015 (UTC)

Not to my knowledge. ~SnapperTo 18:00, March 3, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Six Paths Chakra

You're awesome...was following you simultaneously :D...thanx for your immediate response...really appreciate your sense of responsibility star :] --DARK ZERO--talk 22:58, February 26, 2015 (UTC)

at least U bothered to consider our discussion...not just put it behind your head...I'm grateful for it. --DARK ZERO--talk 23:11, February 26, 2015 (UTC)
Howdy coboy...sry, had 2 other questions regarding the databook...
1. Is will materialization classified as a yin-yang release...or a rinnegan KG...or nuthin at all...
2. Is 6 paths sage tech classified as senjutsu & fuinjutsu... --DARK ZERO--talk 12:36, February 28, 2015 (UTC)
bump... --DARK ZERO--talk 11:18, March 1, 2015 (UTC)
then I'll try suzaku...thanx for replying mate ;] --DARK ZERO--talk 07:01, March 2, 2015 (UTC)


why the hell should i listen to you and not block pages...?? i am as much a chat moderator as you are... Sage Minato (talk) 15:10, March 2, 2015 (UTC)

re: Daniel Bailey

I know he is. But none of the sysops seem to care for indefinitely blocking him. I advised they did so before and it was not done. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 08:56, March 3, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Eight Gates

The eight gates are eight gates. They are not a technique or anything, they're just stuff in the body, like the tenketsu or the heart. The Eight Gates Release Formation is this. • Seelentau 愛 12:23, March 3, 2015 (UTC)

mmh, basically, yes. The state of having the 8th gate opened is that technique. The eight gates in itself are not a technique, if you wondered why I removed the Kinjutsu label. • Seelentau 愛 00:23, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
That's not what I said. • Seelentau 愛 00:57, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
Not at the same time, but in order. After you reached and opened the eighth gate, you're in that state. I wonder if you could open only the eighth gate, though... • Seelentau 愛 01:09, March 4, 2015 (UTC)

By the way, I forgot about "Hachimon Tonkō". According to the databook entry for Hirudora, it exists and apparently is the state of having one or more gates opened, up to the eighth, which is then called "Hachimon Tonkō no Jin". So basically, Hachimon are the gates, Hachimon Tonko is the state of having them opened and Hachimon Tonko no Jin is the state of having the eighth gate opened. Does that sound viable? • Seelentau 愛 20:27, March 5, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Asura and YYR

Weren't the powers he gave his sons just the body/eyes stuff? YYR was never mentioned. • Seelentau 愛 01:39, March 4, 2015 (UTC)

On the last page, you mean? By that logic, Ashura must've had all the feats Naruto and Sasuke gained, meaning Rinnegan, TSB, YYR, Six Paths Senjutsu mode. Which is not the case. Hagoromo is really just talking about power: First it was only Ashura who had power (as the head of Ninshu), and now it's Naruto and Sasuke who have power. • Seelentau 愛 01:53, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
No idea why that, either. I mean, it makes sense, seeing how they basically represent Yin and Yang, but since it's not confirmed... • Seelentau 愛 02:01, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
It isn't, but we can't say it for certain, either. It's a shame that the databook didn't elaborate on this. :/ • Seelentau 愛 02:33, March 4, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Proving a point

First and foremost, no disruptive behavior was happening, I did not create an article and nominated it for deletion, I politely voiced my opinion on this matter in the talk page. Needless to say, it's only my opinion and the article needs to exist, at least for now, like it's predecessors that I've listed in the talk page. And also, to put it all shortly, taking it to the respective talk page is a better way to make people notice the (issue?) than in the forums.--Omojuze (talk) 05:41, March 4, 2015 (UTC)

If you are suggesting the whole deletion of the Shrinking Technique page, there was a talk page post in there, but nowadays, it is somehow really hard to get a rational response. An editor suggested deleting it, I agreed. Nobody put in any of their thoughts in the talk page, and there was time to do so, so that's why i nominated it for deletion.--Omojuze (talk) 13:41, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
Whether I asked or not, the article should've still been created, following the other examples, and I did just that. Guess asking a question/raising a topic for others to see in the talk page is a crime now. Good to know.--Omojuze (talk) 14:03, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
And I do understand what you're trying to say. Yet it's not like I created an empty article and then got raged in the talk page about its creation.--Omojuze (talk) 14:04, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
It's not like I tagged all unnamed genjutsu for deletion. I politely took it to the talk page to discuss this. If nobody will agree with me, I won't throw a tantrum or anything. I did nor will I do something of the sort and I don't really feel like I did anything of an issue here. I read what you've sent me and if I hadn't included the words "created in the purpose of proving a point", everything would've been fine. But, the article, as of the things we currently do, is not for debate for deletion. Pal, you just blew this out of proportion, but It's ok, I think I need to be more careful about what I say because I can be misunderstood.--Omojuze (talk) 14:35, March 4, 2015 (UTC)

My Talk Page

WindStar, you use the Wikia skin, don't you? Do you mind going to my talk page for me and telling if it's working? 'Cause on my side, it isn't. The link on the bar that shows my username, my talk, preferences, watchlist, etc... Well, the talk is became a red link and when I clicked on it, it leads me to Message Wall:NinjaSheik, which doesn't exist. I don't why mine isn't working while I'm able to access your talk page just fine. EDIT: Oh, wait! If I access my talk page through my watchlist, I'm able to get my talk page, but the link on the bar is still red. Strange...--NinjaSheik 04:22, March 5, 2015 (UTC)

That is a bug due to the Wikia update. A change was unintentionally made that changed all the links to Message_Wall:<yournamehere> if the forum module was enabled. It was already reported to Wikia and should be fixed soon. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 09:10, March 5, 2015 (UTC)
Ah, thank you, SuperSajuuk, for telling me! WindStar, mine is still not working properly. :( Guess I'll have to wait. Thanks, guys~! :)--NinjaSheik 21:17, March 5, 2015 (UTC)
Still red, unfortunately. :( I'm just going to have to wait it out.--NinjaSheik 23:52, March 5, 2015 (UTC)
Correct! The URL still exists, and I can get into it by accessing it by, for example, click on the History tab and find my username and click on the link to my talk page. But whenever it up on the bar, it's red. Geez, I hope this gets fixed soon.--NinjaSheik 04:28, March 6, 2015 (UTC)
I'll contact them about it first before changing over. Thanks for the assist! :)--NinjaSheik 23:38, March 6, 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, I know. :) It's been fixed since yesterday.--NinjaSheik 23:36, March 10, 2015 (UTC)
This sounds rather urgent. I can't do it tonight, but tomorrow definitely. What's this about?--NinjaSheik 00:46, March 13, 2015 (UTC)
I'm on the Chat now. Are you available now?--NinjaSheik 01:23, March 14, 2015 (UTC)


Your signature is quite long, in many cases twice as long as whatever comment you're making. The wiki has no restrictions on sig length, but there are nevertheless reasons not to have a long signature. Please consider simplifying it. ~SnapperTo 18:24, March 5, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Been meaning to ask this for a while

uhm... don't we translate senjutsu? I assumed it. • Seelentau 愛 00:41, March 6, 2015 (UTC)

Well then, why're you asking? :P Kidding aside, I don't know why we translate it. I translated it because I'm the translator, but that mustn't mean that we definitely have to use that translation. • Seelentau 愛 01:16, March 6, 2015 (UTC)
No no, by any means, go ahead and make the changes. • Seelentau 愛 01:41, March 6, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Six Paths Senjutsu

Thanks for bringing that up again and changing it. The inconsistent "Sage Technique" translation was bothering me for a while now.--BeyondRed (talk) 02:44, March 6, 2015 (UTC)

Re: TSB and Expansive TSB

Well, since "parent technique" is a term that fans made up, and thus can be changed by fans, it can be either way. • Seelentau 愛 12:50, March 7, 2015 (UTC)

No idea. I only know that the lack of set guidelines does more harm than good. • Seelentau 愛 18:09, March 7, 2015 (UTC)


Windstar what happened to my edits And i dont know how increase my value Thekng123 (talk) 21:42, March 7, 2015 (UTC)

Are you the guy that keeps Changing my edits Thebest423r (talk) 02:46, March 8, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Moderator to Mod

Eh, I just wanted to shorten it for no particular reason. People can hover over the text to find out what it means. :P

On another note: they're gonna be adding a user preference to disable syntax highlighting on the classic editor, which is good news imo (I've loathed seeing it and it doesn't help me at all :D) --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 20:59, March 10, 2015 (UTC)

re: infinite

You should know why I chose to make it clear it would be infinite. She has a lot of blocks to her credit, unimportant and pointless edits, tons upon tons of warnings to stop making such edits (which she has demonstrated to not give a toss about and continues) and repeatedly edit warring with every editor when other editors correct her bad editing practices. She is just simply inventing jobs because she can't legitimately contribute to the wiki and the wiki should not need to put up with it anymore. In my experience, threatening an infinite block from a wiki usually gets people to actually seriously consider whether they're helping or hindering the project: I don't like the idea of infinitely blocking users, but if it has to be done, so be it. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 21:59, March 11, 2015 (UTC)

While sockpuppetry and constant vandalism are indeed reasons for infinite blocking, regular users who are not vandals but just constantly cause work for the wiki despite a huge number of warnings can be infinitely blocked.
While it's generally advised to educate users, Kunoichi101 shows absolutely no intent on giving a shit for constant warnings. You can see that she constantly causes work for other editors and floods the page histories with unnecessary edits. These warnings are a waste of editor's time and we would do a lot better not having to constantly educate her on her terrible editing practices.
Hell, if I kept making bad edits, I would expect an infinite block if I was ignoring editors. It can happen to anyone for any reason. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 22:07, March 11, 2015 (UTC)
i have a feeling that you two are talking about me. did i really make a bad mistake just because i would be blocked forever? just saying Kunoichi101 (talk) 23:01, March 11, 2015 (UTC) sigh "What exactly about her edits are bad?" said TheUltimate3. I feel stupid after someone thinks that my edits are bad for no reason. of course i really got blocked sometimes back then, but doesn't Sajuuk really mean it? Kunoichi101 (talk) 01:39, March 12, 2015 (UTC)
ok, maybe i'm really ignorant for the past years and true I really want to help, but even though i did agrue with the others like the colors of the forehead protector and know it's kinda irritating for me to notice some stuffs like an image near a detailed summary not atop of it. sigh and i was told that i may make a poll after two weeks if it's old or something. sigh so much for the warnings. maybe Sajuuk really hates me for that many reasons. Kunoichi101 (talk) 02:39, March 12, 2015 (UTC)

re: poweruser

It is just an identifier for Wikia to know who are active on wiki's, which will allow them to target surveys and other things at them (to find out exactly what can be done to improve their experience on such wiki's). It confers no rights or benefits though and is currently very experimental. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 09:51, March 14, 2015 (UTC)

Re: LoZ

It's pretty late in my timezone now, so I give you the gist of my list in a few words as possible. :)

1.) Twilight Princess - LOVED EVERYTHING ABOUT IT! Storyline, graphics, characters, bosses, everything! Midna, Zelda and Link (love his wolf form!) are beautiful, and Midna has become one of my all time favorites!

2.) Skyward Sword - Graphics are second best, and I loved how it ties together the overall history of the series! Plus, they brought back Impa, and I love Fi!

3.) Ocarina of Time - My brother played this game when I was a little kid, and it was the first game I ever saw, so it holds a special place in my heart. :) Plus, I love Sheik, and the concept of "Sheik" is something I always loved!--NinjaSheik 04:16, March 15, 2015 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I can't answer that question. ^___^; I never played the game myself. Ever since I was a kid, I always watched other people play games Be it my older brother, my cousin, or walkthroughs on online.--NinjaSheik 21:59, March 15, 2015 (UTC)

Yep. I was always more of a watcher than a gamer. The Cave of Ordeals? Isn't that the part of the game where you can reach the Great Fairy?--NinjaSheik 03:17, March 16, 2015 (UTC)

Lol, it's fine. :)--NinjaSheik 22:41, March 16, 2015 (UTC)


Get on chat if you can. Need to talk about something. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 21:09, March 17, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Talk Page Formatting

Thanks. Munchvtec (talk) 11:46, March 19, 2015 (UTC)

Uchia clan massacre anime and manga versions (chapters 590, 619)

I thought I would leave this message here in the talk page as well. I think that the anime and manga material on the Uchia massacre should be clearly separated. For example, in chapter 619, the Third Hokage, when questioned about the Uchia incident, said "*We* ordered him to kill his clan... so he slaughtered his entire clan to prevent the coup, and in doing so stopped an even greater bloodshed that would have ensued". He continued to repeat "we", including himself. That's exactly the version given by Tobi, implying that both the Hokage and the Council were involved (it also conflicts with Itachi's flashback in chapter 590 because it adds "with the lone condition that I keep his brother from harm": this is like Tobi's version of the events, and differs from Itachi's version in which Danzo was the one making the offer). Also, he seemed to take the position that the coup was indeed beyond the possibility of resolution by peaceful means (which was Shishui's own position, *before* the encounter with Sarutobi and the elders: this is not made clear in various articles, and in particular in some instances this encounter with Shishui is presented before the talk with the council and Danzo, while in chapter 590 it happened afterwards). In any case, this point on the situation is made repeatedly and rather explicitly in the manga: in chapter 590 by Shishui first, and by the Elders and Danzo second, and in chapter 619 by the Third and Second -in particular, the Third's words seem to suggest an additional encounter in which both he and the Elders asked Itachi to go through with the plan-. This differs significantly from the view expressed in some articles that a diplomatic soultion would have been viable but was not tried, or that the massacre didn't really serve to avoid a world war, but was only a whim of Danzo. I think that Sarutobi's words in chapter 619, in particular, should make this a rather moot point as far as the manga is concerned (the anime apparently follows another plotline in which the Third's role in the events and assessment of Itachi's actions differs significantly from the Third's position on the fact that Itachi's contribution had been essential to prevent an unavoidable massacre, expressed in chapter 619). This obviously conflicts with the anime version of the events, but this distinction is not explained well in a number of articles (Danzo, Sarutobi, the ones on the Uchia/Uchia curse of hatred/Uchia's downfall/etc., as well as, the chapter's plot). I should again stress that the picture presented by Kishimoto in chapters 590 and 619 in particular (which also see a consensus on the issue by the Third and Second) differs significantly by the one presented in the articles above (incidentally, the parts on the Uchia military police in some articles present only the Uchia side of the situation, ignoring the facts presented by the Second in chapter 619, as well as the fact that apparently the dojutsu produced paranoia and overreaction -such as Madara choosing to use a Biju in two occasions when he didn't get his way, which adds weight to the Second's position about their instability, the so called "curse of hatred"-). In the anime the plot might be different as far as the Third's role and assessment of the events (I didn't watch it, so I can't really tell), but if that's the case, the difference with the manga canon material should be made explicit, rather than having everyting jumbled together, or even not discussed (some articles link to chapters 590 and 619, but don't actually present the view expressed, even in the case of the very article on chapter 619).--Melvin62 (talk) 14:05, March 20, 2015 (UTC)--Melvin62 (talk) 14:08, March 20, 2015 (UTC)--Melvin62 (talk) 14:08, March 20, 2015 (UTC)

re: pointless edits

Ignoring the text wall above this post, yes those edits are unnecessary. I'm not really sure why Omnibender does those kind of edits, it's sorta encouraging users like Kunoichi101 to keep on making such edits themselves. I'm quite busy at the moment, so feel free to ask Omnibender why he's doing it. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 20:44, March 20, 2015 (UTC)

Nah, you ask him and I'll watch his response and jump in after ;) --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 20:47, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
I left him a message. Also, join chat if you can ;) --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 21:34, March 21, 2015 (UTC)
Chat if you can. thanks. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 21:18, March 25, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Chat

Thanks for the link! --SSJ2AJB (talk) 22:42, March 22, 2015 (UTC)

Byakugan for the Children of Naruto and Hinata

In your opinion, why do you consider the additional information I provided to be unnecessary in the Trivia section? ShinyMagikarp (talk) 04:18, March 23, 2015 (UTC)

Re:Btw your profile pics...

Oh wow, somebody actually noticed them! I'm flattered, thank you! :D

Sometime before, I also used another Lee expression, which you can see here. :D Norleon (talk) 21:03, March 24, 2015 (UTC)


Ok I understand what you are saying, and I realize that we should not list ranks to techniques unless it is supported by the data book or something along those lines. But if I could point out one thing, I know it probably does make much sense but the B-rank Typhoon Water Vortex Technique was a result of Naruto's A-rank Wind Release: Rasengan and Yamato's B-rank Water Release: Tearing Torrent. Naruto's S-rank Wind Release: Rasenshuriken were either just made bigger or he wielded two at one time. Now i am not saying you have to agree but, if you think of it from this standpoint Naruto's Rasenshuriken were not influenced by another person's technique instead he just increased the power of them that's why I believed they were marked S-rank. In the future I will consort with other users before editing ranks. --Greatsage92 (talk) 05:06, March 27, 2015 (UTC)

Gyūki's 'Supercharge'

Hey, WindStar7125. It's been days now and pretty much no one besides you and me have said anything about Gyūki supercharging (that's what it looks like) a Tailed Beast Ball right before it combines with Kurama's. Can I go ahead and change it, or just leave another message on the talk page that'll probably take days to respond to? --SSJ2AJB (talk) 23:48, March 27, 2015 (UTC)

Okay cool.--SSJ2AJB (talk) 23:51, March 27, 2015 (UTC)

Re:Jutsu Names

Thank you this did help--4th Six Paths (talk) 02:16, March 28, 2015 (UTC)

Oh and also how do you find the literal translation do you use some kind of Japanese to English website?--4th Six Paths (talk) 02:37, March 28, 2015 (UTC)

Shikamaru Hiden: A Cloud Drifting in Silent Darkness

There are at least thirteen chapters.

ShinyMagikarp (talk) 02:57, March 28, 2015 (UTC)

There are only the named chapters I gave in the article. Those chapters are split into smaller chapters, though. So it's like chapter 1: Konoha (chapter 1.1, 1.2, ...), chapter 2: The Land of Silence (chapter 2.1, 2.2, ...) and so on. That's nothing unusual, however, those chapter parts aren't count as new chapters. • Seelentau 愛 10:59, March 28, 2015 (UTC)

List of Volumes issues

I don't know how to edit that page and there are two issues that need fixing. 1. The link Team Ten (volume) needs to be changed to the Team 10 (volume) link due to a recent page move that left no redirect. 2. Adding the English release dates for the final two manga volumes that I already updated their individual pages with after discovering the details on Amazon with. It would be great if I could get some help for this. -Adv193 (talk) 03:02, March 28, 2015 (UTC)

Chat #2

Possible? --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 22:53, March 28, 2015 (UTC)

Oh lordy, you have to get in chat, I need to tell you about something. You'll find it hilarious. ;) --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 20:51, April 4, 2015 (UTC)
If you can. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 06:03, April 10, 2015 (UTC)
I thought as much. It's only 7am for me (damn parents got me awake far too early, couldn't get back to sleep >_>), so I may not be on as long as normal. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 06:11, April 10, 2015 (UTC)

Random Thought

Since I've been rewatching Inuyasha when I read your name I read "wind scar" not "wind star". XDCloudtheavenger (talk) 08:54, March 29, 2015 (UTC)

Tho IMHO I feel wind scar sounds way better than wind star.Cloudtheavenger (talk) 08:56, March 29, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Pictures

I got them from here: I put this link on them as the source. Most the official Naruto social media always put this site when giving news. And you can see the copyright there, Kishimoto/Shueisha. Narsha (talk) 22:40, March 29, 2015 (UTC)

I almost forgot, they are also here: Narsha (talk) 22:42, March 29, 2015 (UTC)
Sadly, I don't. I only know some kanji and most katakana. Narsha (talk) 22:56, March 29, 2015 (UTC)
I just edited Naruto Gaiden and Sarada's pages. Boruto's is blocked. Narsha (talk) 23:51, March 29, 2015 (UTC)
I see, thank you. Narsha (talk) 00:39, March 30, 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for adding Boruto's picture. And you are welcome. That was the first wiki page that I made, so I'm very happy. And you did a great job, adding all those new sections to characters' articles, thank you.Narsha (talk) 03:57, April 1, 2015 (UTC)

re: thread

That thread wasn't closed primarily based on the question being answered. It was closed because that is not what the forums are for. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 17:14, April 1, 2015 (UTC)

I'll admit it was the wrong reason, but I was in a rush at the time. Technically, the question was answered: I didn't want to write "not what the forums are for" because I suspected that I would be complained at by other users about "well, what are they for?". --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 17:18, April 1, 2015 (UTC)

video Games

Lots of pages use Revolutions as a reference and using material from the game so I thought people considered it canon. I was just following the pack. My apologies.Cloudtheavenger (talk) 20:06, April 2, 2015 (UTC)

Was just trying to make a suggestion that could help the site...

I didn't mean for it to be such a bad one. I didn't want to link my stories to the site, just thought if that other people had the option it would curb the people posting fanon on a regular basis to the articles.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 21:29, April 4, 2015 (UTC)


I have a suggestion for the Versus forum, by the way. Another website I go to has a 'battledome' and we have some rules and Versus topic set ups, as well as using evidence and feats. It might help make the battles more fun on the Versus forum.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 03:53, April 7, 2015 (UTC)

Windstar theres a giant problem Thekng123 (talk) 02:21, April 9, 2015 (UTC)

Re: couldn't believe this at all

I know right lol? I like the DBZ series itself, and these recent movies weren't so bad, but Goku's SSG forms are pretty derivative. And I thought Frieza going Super Saiyan was a mind-screw. --SSJ2AJB (talk) 22:11, April 9, 2015 (UTC)

I'd pay real money to see that! Seriously though, the first SSG form was a let-down and now this new blue Super Saiyan form? I feel like they're taking the first step into making Dragon Ball AF real smh. --SSJ2AJB (talk) 22:36, April 9, 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, I know. I'm actually pretty eager to see the movie when it's released on the web (that and the Boruto movie), which probably won't be for several months, but what the hell. You excited or no?--SSJ2AJB (talk) 23:07, April 9, 2015 (UTC)

RE:Infobox images

When there's a fine image already in place and i found a possible better one, i do follow that advice i gave to Rex and bring it up on the talk page. But if something sets the current image apart from the usual standard, such as with the lighting or the expression, my opinion is that there's really little reason to not change it.

The character images i did change recently are TenTen - half her head was in frame, Guy - completely edited, Inoichi - lighting and angle, Ino - only character of the wiki to have her hand on her face and eyes are looking off screen, and the new characters for quality and expression. Which do you suggest wasn't justified in changing so i can bring it up on their talk page. And even if the matter does get brought up on a talk page, users usually ignore it as you did with that team fu image change discussion. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 09:10, April 10, 2015 (UTC)

Im aware of bumping a discussion to get a response, i do it from time to time. But the fact of the matter is there is as much chance of starting an image war over changing an image in some characters ability section, as there is with their info box. So what's the different about changing the info box image compared to changing the rest of the images throughout the article? --Sarutobii2 (talk) 17:56, April 10, 2015 (UTC)

Did I insult ItachiWasAHero?

Or anyone else? I didn't call him a bad name, just was addressing his arguments and why they didn't work.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 00:25, April 11, 2015 (UTC)

I'd really like to know how this comment is insulting in any way "Dude A said Minato was faster than him. He didn't say anything about that Minato was only faster with his Hiraishin. The Anime and Manga both state that Minato is faster than A. Canon info > Your opinion." It is a FACT that info from the Manga is above any one's OPINION. I'd really like to know how a fact is insulting. --SwordSlayer99 (talk) 00:46, April 11, 2015 (UTC)
I guess you two are blind to your other posts then. Don't be hypocrites now. You'll regret that injustice. —This unsigned comment was made by ItachiWasAHero (talkcontribs) . 00:49, April 11, 2015 (UTC)
I'm blind to my other posts? Very well then I will post every thing I commented right here and you can tell me how there insults. "Wtf? "Sage Mode Kabuto is not slower than Minato" Even Minato in his base form is faster then Sage Mode Kabuto. Remember the Nine-Tails attack on Konoha when Minato was displayed as faster than Obito and Obito is much faster than Sage Mode Kabuto. In terms of speed, Base Minato > Pre-Jinchuriki Obito > Sage Mode Kabuto. Unless you somehow want to prove that Kabuto is faster than Pre-Jinchuriki Obito, which isn't happening." I fail to see how there is an insult in this comment. ""1. That was never stated anywhere so thats just your speculation." Did you seriously just post this? LOL. Actually it was stated that he was faster than A and thus is only slower than the people mentioned in this comment "1. Kabuto is slower than Minato regardless. Minato, even without Hiraishin, 'is considered the fastest shinobi in history, only surprassed by Eight Gated Guy, BM/BSM Naruto, RSM Naruto, Rinnegan Sasuke, and Juubi Jins Madara and Obito." Just add Kaguya, Toneri, Juubi, and the Ootsutsuki brothers and it will be 100% correct" I once again fail to see how there is an insult here. "A outright stated that Minato was faster than him." See above. And that's all my comments. Now then since I am apparently a hypocrite I would really like you to tell me when I insulted him in any way. --SwordSlayer99 (talk) 00:56, April 11, 2015 (UTC)
@SwordSlayer99, that isn't the reason why I hit you with a forum warning. Read your talkpage. @ItachiWasAHero, please sign your posts. To all of you, don't start a catfight on my talkpage. Seriously. WindStar7125 Divine Mangekyō Sharingan VolteMetalic 00:58, April 11, 2015 (UTC)

"He's wanking Itachi." I still don't understand what your trying to say. Wanking means inflating the power of a character beyond there showings and that is literally what he did. I didn't use the term "Wanking" in an insulting way I used it cause that's exactly what he did. Right down to the definition of the word. And to prove I didn't mean it in an insulting way afterwords I even said " Isn't there rules on here about not wanking characters?" Specifically asking if it was against the rules to wank characters. --SwordSlayer99 (talk) 01:12, April 11, 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, things are a little less lax but a bit more straightforward when it comes to rules on debates where I usually post. Debates usually get heated and I hold my tongue a lot...if this was back in the way past, I lacked a lot of self control that I had to learn over time. I will do even better when it comes to debates and the wiki in general.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 01:21, April 11, 2015 (UTC)

I know for a fact

That I signed my recent posts to the request page. Something is going on and I don't like it at all. It may be an error, idk. But I'm watching from here on out and print screening every one of my posts. Thanks for letting me know, WindStar. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 01:38, April 11, 2015 (UTC)

I have no problem with you as of yet, so please refrain from insulting me with "don't start a catfight on my talkpage. Seriously." If I am insulted again I will contact TheUltimate3 and/or Dantman. You're cool man, but I won't be walked all over by anyone. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 01:41, April 11, 2015 (UTC)

Man to man, idk if you were simply saying "cool." because you didn't feel like making a long response, or "cool." because you have a problem with me, after further inspection it seems somebody edited then removed my signature from those posts on your page. If you have a problem with me come out and tell me in chat, we can have a private chat there. I don't get any of this junk that's going on and would rather not have to talk to TheUltimate3 and Dantman about everything going on. Are we good or is there actually a problem?? ItachiWasAHero (talk) 01:56, April 11, 2015 (UTC)

I was not referring to that post about the block or the block, I can somewhat understand the block because yes I did lose my temper and blatantly insult him. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 02:03, April 11, 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the link. ItachiWasAHero (talk) 02:32, April 11, 2015 (UTC)

How do these look for the Versus Forum? ? Just wondering what your thought on these rules and such? Anything to add?--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 02:14, April 11, 2015 (UTC)

Forum issues

Hi WindStar. Please message me when you have a free moment to join the chat. I need to discuss issues with the forum boards and ways we can resolve them. I will be available from after 8pm BST, for about 2 hours, this evening if that gives any indication for a time. Thank you. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 14:18, April 11, 2015 (UTC)

I want to discuss solutions first before we present them for discussion to the community. That way, we don't have a massive pissing fight and the discussion is focused only on the solutions we've presented to them. ;) --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 19:07, April 11, 2015 (UTC)
If we just leave the thread open to allow users to provide any solution they want, I can assure you it will turn into a major issue, as each side will clash and start flame wars, and we'll have crazy solutions presented that aren't actual solutions to the problem. So we can avoid this by discussing solutions ourselves first, present these solutions to the community and ask their opinion (while still leaving it open to people to provide their own solution, but it's better to have our own solutions first)
There's also some other stuff that I would prefer not to discuss on a public talkpage or forum thread, which relates to some stuff that happened last night while I was offline, so... --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 19:14, April 11, 2015 (UTC)


Adding floating boxes to pages is against the TOUs for "Blocking ads and blocking other skin elements (Monobook included). Elements added to pages should contain themselves within the article area." (from wikia staff)--~UltimateSupreme 16:25, April 11, 2015 (UTC)

The one on this page too--~UltimateSupreme 04:48, April 12, 2015 (UTC)

Ya, sure--~UltimateSupreme 04:53, April 12, 2015 (UTC)

kaguya meme

Don't have it saved sorry.--Elve [Mod] Talk Page|Contribs 19:27, April 11, 2015 (UTC)

Yup, your memory is better than mine ^_ --Elve [Mod] Talk Page|Contribs 19:40, April 11, 2015 (UTC)
That was my intent. Something for people to have some fun around here, but not too over the top.--Elve [Mod] Talk Page|Contribs 19:44, April 11, 2015 (UTC)

RE: Warning

...then how am I supposed to act or address when someone doesn't put any other information down on the topic at hand? When someone doesn't present enough information or evidence, yet continues to insist on points, what exactly are you supposed to do in that situation in a debate? Wait for a Moderator to make a decision on the battle on who would win based on everything presented?--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 21:07, April 11, 2015 (UTC)

But even if its pointed out, its often ignored. Should Moderators have a final say on things so debates don't go out of control?--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 21:17, April 11, 2015 (UTC)

Input wanted

If you could please add something from the mind of @Windy here please do. maybe it should be in a forum or something but i don't know. Munchvtec (talk) 12:32, April 13, 2015 (UTC)

re: forum mods

A quick glance at the JS file shows this was being manually added. I'll let UltimateSupreme know when I can, but the identifier on their posts on the forums should be enough for now at least ;) --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 21:25, April 16, 2015 (UTC)


I just hope that the way Obito betrayed Madara soon become the reality in the anime.--AlexHoskins (talk) 23:18, April 16, 2015 (UTC) AlexHoskins

re: edit

I saw your post to KazeKitsune, and I know why. We use an extension that transcludes sections of text onto other pages (that's what the section tag represents). So when it's transcluded, it acts like it was written there. KazeKitsune, I assume, placed the noinclude tags so the link for tailed beasts, when transcluded on Tailed Beasts wouldn't be emboldened pointlessly. Side effect, sadly. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 20:08, April 17, 2015 (UTC)


Notice that the Tailed Beasts and tailed beast character articles are connected with the Main with include and section summary tags respectively. The noninclude tags on the character articles prevents the brackets to be included in the section summary tag for the Tailed Beasts article since you are already on the said article. In addition, it doesn't interfere with the link to the Tailed Beasts article from the character articles. I also did the same thing for the Naruto Uzumaki and Naruto Uzumaki's Relationships articles. Hope this helps! KazeKitsune (talk) 21:06, April 17, 2015 (UTC)

Just uploaded a new Avatar!

How does it look, WindStar?--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 00:00, April 18, 2015 (UTC)

Aww, no good or bad comment :P.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 00:39, April 18, 2015 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki