I'd appreciate discussion before our deletion-minded friends do what they do best.--Newthx2u (talk) 03:41, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- Don't sound so smug. Regardless there is nothing to discuss. This holds canonical weight as it appeared in a databook just don't expect it to be linked anywhere.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 04:18, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- Taking back what I just said, this holds no weight at all and is about as much as that puppet one. Now your gonna have to do some good convincing about why this page shouldn't be deleted.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 04:26, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- lol i didnt mean to sound smug, just trying to make a joke. That puppet one was from some cover and was meant as a cultural reference to the series, as there were several narutos dressed in typical noh theatre fashion. this is piece is done in a more serious fashion and, unlike the puppet one, holds a strong chance of actually being performed in the series. I"m not expecting it to be linked to anything anyways because as of yet it has no connections to much else. if or when it appears among other parts of the cannon it should have some large additions. --Newthx2u (talk) 04:35, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- There was also a lovely picture of Taka standing there with Naruto on the back of a frog. Anyway, thats not a very convincing reason on why this article should remain.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 04:38, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- that taka/frog picture didn't even show a technique though. as a matter of fact that was just two previoius images put together from earlier in the series. you said yourself it was cannonical as it was in a databook. the artbook also showed the remaining bijuu, which have not appeared anywhere else in the cannon yet deservedly have their own pages on this wiki.
- Yeah I said that. Then upon further thought it doesn't. The Tailed Beasts, being actual characters in the book differ greatly than a random drawing. Gonna need more than that, cause as of now, this page is delete worthy.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 04:53, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- The Taka/frog combo has always been just one image (see chapter 356). Almost all of those images have previously appeared in some promotional capacity, and at most are useful for showing what something or someone looks like. In the case of this jutsu, you could consider it Kishimoto's take on what Rasenshuriken looked like when Naruto used it against Kakuzu. ~SnapperTo 05:17, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- that taka/frog picture didn't even show a technique though. as a matter of fact that was just two previoius images put together from earlier in the series. you said yourself it was cannonical as it was in a databook. the artbook also showed the remaining bijuu, which have not appeared anywhere else in the cannon yet deservedly have their own pages on this wiki.
- There was also a lovely picture of Taka standing there with Naruto on the back of a frog. Anyway, thats not a very convincing reason on why this article should remain.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 04:38, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- lol i didnt mean to sound smug, just trying to make a joke. That puppet one was from some cover and was meant as a cultural reference to the series, as there were several narutos dressed in typical noh theatre fashion. this is piece is done in a more serious fashion and, unlike the puppet one, holds a strong chance of actually being performed in the series. I"m not expecting it to be linked to anything anyways because as of yet it has no connections to much else. if or when it appears among other parts of the cannon it should have some large additions. --Newthx2u (talk) 04:35, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
In a moment of clarity, brought by the end of my raid, I'm not going to worry about this article. I will watch it, but I'm not going to do anything. Suffer well.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 05:06, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- "Suffer"? hey man, i never tried to start a war here. i just saw something noteworthy to the cannon and made an article about it (possibly the purpose of this wiki). I'm a strict cannon-only guy on this site, and i wouldnt just randomly go and make something if i didnt think it had a bit of necessity. --Newthx2u (talk) 12:37, 4 July 2009 (UTC)12:27, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- "Suffer well" is farewell of Death Knights. They are beings brought to life back to life by the Lich King and must spend an eternity as abominations with no place in the world. They are a very doom and gloom kind of people.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 12:30, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
I suggest this article be deleted. That image is nothing more than the Rasenshuriken. Kishimoto himself comments on it: "For both the Rasengan and the Rasenshuriken, the colours are randomly decided. I should really make up a proper rule." --ShounenSuki (talk | contribs) 21:11, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
how does this article contain false info, everything that is on the page is obvious from the picture Vik0z0z (talk) 22:27, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- How about...
- The very existence of this technique
- The name
- It being a different colour than the "normal" Rasenshuriken
- It being a "demon-enhanced" version of the Rasenshuriken
- Four points, enough for me to put up that notice. --ShounenSuki (talk | contribs) 22:50, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
well it is definitely demon enhanced, as you can tell from naruto's eyes Vik0z0z (talk) 23:23, 13 July 2009 (UTC)