Ad blocker interference detected!
Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers
Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.
It should have unusable status next to it in Kakashi's jutsu list.
As far as i've seen it was only snapped in half and that is nowhere near being destroyed. Since it was only snapped in half it can be fixed with the consequence that it may not glow as bright or even at all. WolfMaster (talk) 23:18, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
- I'd assume that's the colour of their chakra, or just something that was unique to the weapon.--Cerez365™ 19:29, September 17, 2011 (UTC)
Would anyone have a problem with me replacing the word 'destroyed' with 'broken' on the page? Unless I'm missing something, destroyed implies that it can never be repaired or used again... 126.96.36.199 (talk) 07:32, December 8, 2012 (UTC)
- Broken, destroyed, they're the same thing. Destroyed's better. --X29 07:33, December 8, 2012 (UTC)
I was just wondering, is there a particular reason it is called the "White Light Chakra Sabre"? It is not a sabre/saber - it is a tantō, a Japanese short sword. I believe a more accurate translation of its Japanese name would be "White Light Chakra Sword" or "White Light Chakra Blade". --anon188.8.131.52 (talk) 01:14, March 11, 2013 (UTC)
- It does not use the kanji for blade, it uses the kanji for sword. Despite physically being a tantō, it was named as a tantō. Sword and sabre are both translations for the kanji used in the name of this weapon. Not sure why sabre was used over sword, but they're both accurate translations. No harm done in keeping it with its current name. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 01:18, March 11, 2013 (UTC)
Is this blade similar to the Kiba swords, with chakra pre-imbued into it, granting it automatic chakra flow and preemptive sharpness at all times? Like does the databook say anything of the sort anywhere, or can we assume it? Yatanogarasu (Talk) 05:44, September 6, 2014 (UTC)