What is the point of an article that contains the "exact same" info as another article? [[User talk:Simant|S<small>im</small>A<small>nt</small>]] 21:15, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
What is the point of an article that contains the "exact same" info as another article? [[User talk:Simant|S<small>im</small>A<small>nt</small>]] 21:15, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
:Overload essentially. A lot of information that was going in about the summons was confusing the info about the technique itself. Thus, to avoid confusion and to allow more detail I made this section. Moreover, you will note that the information is not the same anymore. [[User:Thomas Finlayson|Thomas Finlayson]] ([[User talk:Thomas Finlayson|talk]]) 22:22, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
:Overload essentially. A lot of information that was going in about the summons was confusing the info about the technique itself. Thus, to avoid confusion and to allow more detail I made this section. Moreover, you will note that the information is not the same anymore. [[User:Thomas Finlayson|Thomas Finlayson]] ([[User talk:Thomas Finlayson|talk]]) 22:22, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
+
:Your solution is to duplicate an entire article, and then chainsaw the original, which was fine? [[User talk:Simant|S<small>im</small>A<small>nt</small>]] 18:21, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
What is the point of an article that contains the "exact same" info as another article? SimAnt 21:15, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
Overload essentially. A lot of information that was going in about the summons was confusing the info about the technique itself. Thus, to avoid confusion and to allow more detail I made this section. Moreover, you will note that the information is not the same anymore. Thomas Finlayson (talk) 22:22, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
Your solution is to duplicate an entire article, and then chainsaw the original, which was fine? SimAnt 18:21, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
Edit