Needed?[]
Really??? Munchvtec (talk) 04:38, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, really. :)--WindStar7125
05:06, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
I don't think so, if it was then it would have already been made. we have all this info on other pages. Munchvtec (talk) 05:08, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
- Wouldn't it be better to make it a section on the Chakra article instead?--
JOA20 06:11, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
I was thinking about that too. i just dont think it warrants it's own article. Munchvtec (talk) 06:18, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
- I just read the article and it makes little sense on its own. It's written in a convoluted manner and it sounds speculative. I don't think it needs it's own artice. Mention in the chakra article would be more appropriate.--Cerez365™
(talk) 06:23, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
Thank You cerez. you finished a disscusion that would have lasted forever. :) Munchvtec (talk) 07:04, September 7, 2014 (UTC)