(→Delete) |
(→Delete) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:I believe it should be, but Deva said the techniques name was not interrupted in the Raw. I would like to see that. But for now I am reverting the original form and leaving this one here.--[[User:TheUltimate3|'''TheUltimate3''']] [[File:Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg|20px]][[User Talk:TheUltimate3| <sup>(talk)</sup>]] 16:17, August 2, 2013 (UTC) |
:I believe it should be, but Deva said the techniques name was not interrupted in the Raw. I would like to see that. But for now I am reverting the original form and leaving this one here.--[[User:TheUltimate3|'''TheUltimate3''']] [[File:Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol.svg|20px]][[User Talk:TheUltimate3| <sup>(talk)</sup>]] 16:17, August 2, 2013 (UTC) |
||
::Have to agree. He was going to either say the name again or possibly launch off into a new name but Tobirama cuts him off. The raw has it as well. Minato goes Scorch Release: Halo Gale... then Tobirama tells him to shut up. Don't technique names normally get exclamation marks instead of ellipses if punctuations are going to be used at all?--[[User:Cerez365|Cerez<small>365</small><sup>™</sup>]][[File:Hyūga Symbol.svg|20px]][[User talk:Cerez365|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 16:23, August 2, 2013 (UTC) |
::Have to agree. He was going to either say the name again or possibly launch off into a new name but Tobirama cuts him off. The raw has it as well. Minato goes Scorch Release: Halo Gale... then Tobirama tells him to shut up. Don't technique names normally get exclamation marks instead of ellipses if punctuations are going to be used at all?--[[User:Cerez365|Cerez<small>365</small><sup>™</sup>]][[File:Hyūga Symbol.svg|20px]][[User talk:Cerez365|<sup>(talk)</sup>]] 16:23, August 2, 2013 (UTC) |
||
| + | :It was Tobirama that said it didn't matter. Why would Minato feel the need to name the same jutsu again after already doing so once? Also there is no arrow in this version. It is not for us to be making these sorts of assumptions. If that is what was said in the raw, then that is what it should be.--'''''[[User talk:Deva 27|Deva]] [[Special:Contributions/Deva 27|27]]''''' 16:26, August 2, 2013 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 16:26, 2 August 2013
Scorch Release
Forgive my ignorance, having not read this section of the manga yet, but any particular reason why this is a Scorch Style technique ? --Speysider Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 15:15, August 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Scorch Release in name only. Named by Minato. General Awesomo (talk) 15:26, August 2, 2013 (UTC)
- There are no references on this page to back up the claim that this is a Scorch Release technique and I don't think Kishi has ever stated exactly what elements the Scorch Release is comprised of. It may be wise not to mention that it's a Scorch Release until it's confirmed that it really is a Scorch Release. --Speysider Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 15:33, August 2, 2013 (UTC)
- 灼遁/shakuton is in its name, therefore it's Scorch Release. This has long been discussed here. General Awesomo (talk) 15:40, August 2, 2013 (UTC)
- There are no references on this page to back up the claim that this is a Scorch Release technique and I don't think Kishi has ever stated exactly what elements the Scorch Release is comprised of. It may be wise not to mention that it's a Scorch Release until it's confirmed that it really is a Scorch Release. --Speysider Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 15:33, August 2, 2013 (UTC)
Variant
Sorry about my ignorance, but why it was created this article?, It's not just a variant of the Scorch Release: HGJBASZ?. LeoHatake 15:55, August 2, 2013 (UTC)
- According to the (currently) last three edits, no. Apparently, Minato wasn't interrupted when he was naming this technique. He named it 灼遁・光輪疾風/Shakuton: Kōrin Shippū instead of 灼遁・光輪疾風漆黒矢零式/Shakuton: Kōrin Shippū Shikkoku no Ya Zeroshiki. General Awesomo (talk) 16:11, August 2, 2013 (UTC)
Delete
Should this article be removed? Even in the raws, Minato didn't complete naming this technique and said "It doesn't matter anyway, just do it" ... http://i1283.photobucket.com/albums/a553/anaspet06/Shakhmootssign_zps2a261e68.png(Contact) 16:11, August 2, 2013 (UTC)
- I believe it should be, but Deva said the techniques name was not interrupted in the Raw. I would like to see that. But for now I am reverting the original form and leaving this one here.--TheUltimate3
(talk) 16:17, August 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Have to agree. He was going to either say the name again or possibly launch off into a new name but Tobirama cuts him off. The raw has it as well. Minato goes Scorch Release: Halo Gale... then Tobirama tells him to shut up. Don't technique names normally get exclamation marks instead of ellipses if punctuations are going to be used at all?--Cerez365™
(talk) 16:23, August 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Have to agree. He was going to either say the name again or possibly launch off into a new name but Tobirama cuts him off. The raw has it as well. Minato goes Scorch Release: Halo Gale... then Tobirama tells him to shut up. Don't technique names normally get exclamation marks instead of ellipses if punctuations are going to be used at all?--Cerez365™
- It was Tobirama that said it didn't matter. Why would Minato feel the need to name the same jutsu again after already doing so once? Also there is no arrow in this version. It is not for us to be making these sorts of assumptions. If that is what was said in the raw, then that is what it should be.--Deva 27 16:26, August 2, 2013 (UTC)
