No, it seems that Jiraiya could use it with his own chakra, since the Sage Art part wasn't in the name. Naruto supposedly might need Sage chakra. 184.108.40.206 (talk) 15:17, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
I believe he's asking about the |parent jutsu parameter, which is currently saying this jutsu is derived from Sage Art: Great Ball Rasengan and not Super Great Ball Rasengan. ~SnapperTo 17:01, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
First it was named Sage Art: Gargantuan Rasengan . Maybe we must add it —This unsigned comment was made by Chris20 (talk • contribs) .
That's not the literal translation of the technique's name. We go with literal translations in the wiki. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 23:38, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
Jiraya hasn't used it so remove it --Chris20 (talk) 11:01, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
Yes that's it --Chris20 (talk) 11:27, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
So... shouldn't this one be considered as a derived from the regular Super Great Ball Rasengan? Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 18:42, June 13, 2010 (UTC)
I think it is devired from Sage art Great Ball rasengan but we kan say that is a Suoer Great Ball Rasengan mixed with Senjutsu --Chris20 (talk) 08:57, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
I changed the parent jutsu to Super Great Ball Rasengan. Anyone have a problem with that?
220.127.116.11 (talk) 14:49, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
I thik it is ok.--Chris20 (talk) 14:51, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
Actually since the jutsu is unique to Naruto, the parrent technique must be unique to Naruto as well. I believe the parent technique must be his Sage Art: Great Ball Rasengan --Gojita (talk)
Just because this is unique doesn't mean the parent jutsu has to be unique. If Wind Style Rasengan was unique to Naruto, would the regular Rasengan be unique to him also?
18.104.22.168 (talk) 21:16, June 21, 2010 (UTC)
As far as we know, Naruto hasn't seen Jiraiya use it, so something can't be the parent Jutsu if the person using the other technique hasn't even witnessed the technique we're try to imply is the parent tech. You can't derive something from a technique you've never seen or possibly heard of, but maybe he's seen it in action (who knows)...--Awale (talk) 20:09, July 28, 2010 (UTC)