Is it such a good idea to replace the manga image with an anime one? The shuriken aren't supposed to spin, which they're obviously doing in the anime image. --ShounenSuki (talk | contribs) 20:20, September 24, 2009 (UTC)

I dont see a problem.. Konan specifically siad "Paper Shuriken"...So its the same thing, and well...a manga is only frames..So they cant cover much.....--AlienGamer--Talk (contribs)-- 20:22, September 24, 2009 (UTC)
The manga can cover more than enough to show if shuriken are spinning or not. They were obviously not spinning in the manga. --ShounenSuki (talk | contribs) 20:30, September 24, 2009 (UTC)
Wat i mean is, the anime has space to expand. But this is the same technique (Konan said the name when using it)...--AlienGamer--Talk (contribs)-- 20:34, September 24, 2009 (UTC)
The Rasen Shuriken was a similar case. No indication was given that it was spinning when Naruto first used it in the manga (no "action lines"), yet it span around like a propeller in the anime. Mohrpheus (talk) 20:38, September 24, 2009 (UTC)
Actually, there were visual indications that the Rasen Shuriken was spinning.
That said, the Paper Shuriken weren't. Yes, the anime has the space to expand upon things, but here they simply changed it, be it by mistake or on purpose. Whatever the case, the primary source for the series is still the manga. --ShounenSuki (talk | contribs) 21:13, September 24, 2009 (UTC)
Didn't the shuriken spin in the latest chapter? (talk) 23:43, September 11, 2010 (UTC)