human puppet info taken down!

why was Komushi human puppet information taken down? it was all correct. (Keilith (talk) 14:57, June 27, 2013 (UTC))

That was not this character anymore, it is a whole new tool and already has an own page. It's the same with these two.Norleon (talk) 14:59, June 27, 2013 (UTC)

oh! yes i see it now, i didn't know their was another page made for this puppet self. (Keilith (talk) 15:02, June 27, 2013 (UTC))

Own Body

Could someone help me here? Why exactly Komushi uses Kugutsu no Jutsu and Chakra Threads? If it is about the arm, the arm was part of his body right? So he didn't needed to use any chakra threads. Correct me if i am wrong. Dan.Faulkner (talk) 22:46, July 9, 2013 (UTC)

How would he opperate the mechanism? The arm we saw him with was pretty much the same one Sasori was working in the beginning of the episode. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 00:39, July 10, 2013 (UTC)
It is diferent, Sasori had fingers to do so, now Komushi didn't had any, Sasori was experimenting it, working on it to get a perfect human-like puppet arm, Komushi using it was with chakra but is own chakra going through his arm and not chakra threads, what do you guys think?. Dan.Faulkner (talk) 11:06, July 10, 2013 (UTC)

It isn't like with human puppets, where the chakra paths are maintained, Komushi literally had his arm amputated and replaced with that of a puppet, and the only way we know to manipulate fine mechanisms like that is the puppet technique. Chakra flow, from all that we've seen doesn't cut it and Komushi didn't seem to possess any hiden skill that would account for it like Shadow Possession. So it's gotta be the puppet techique to control a puppet hand and while he may not have had fingers to create the threads anymore, we've seen Sasori produce them straight from his chest so why not Komushi from his stump? --Hawkeye2701 (talk) 19:34, July 10, 2013 (UTC)

Good point, didn't remembered Sasori's chest chakra threads at all, but the arm is conected, thats my only problem, but now i can accept it a lot better, thanks :). Dan.Faulkner (talk) 19:39, July 10, 2013 (UTC)