So, flame colour and media aside, I see practically no difference between this, Kurama's version, and the movie Lion Turtle version. Anyone opposes to merging them at Fire Breath? Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 01:41, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

Merge, no harm comes from that, Kurama fire is non-canon anyways--Elveonora (talk) 13:27, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
Tailed Beast Fire Breath (I have no idea what the movie Lion Turtle is)--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol (talk) 13:43, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
ARE YOU SERIOus? the flames are totally different! sons are green and dont really seems to be fire turtle is noncannon because movie and kurama could make the rocks flamable. nothing in common at all.—This unsigned comment was made by (talkcontribs) .
With the exception that they all breathe fire? Even the Lion-Turtle would just be added as <no wiki>~game</nowiki> and it'd be two less unnamed articles depicting the same basic thing.--Cerez365Hyūga Symbol(talk) 13:58, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
No need to create a new article, there's one for Fire Breath already, where the movie Lion Turtle thing is listed. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 03:38, March 2, 2013 (UTC)
I was thinking the same thing about Gokū and Kurama's versions should be merged though not sure about the Lion Turtle one. And also, Matatabi was using it in the jinchūriki trailer. --OmegaRasengan (talk) 07:12, March 2, 2013 (UTC)
The articles all list the same information, so no need to keep them separate, really. Four-Tails' version could be included as a slideshow picture to show that it was different in colour.--BeyondRed (talk) 15:52, March 2, 2013 (UTC)

just my 2 cents but yes these techniques all are the same. except color. merging would be a good choice —This unsigned comment was made by (talkcontribs) .