Should we... Edit

Merge with Team Asuma? Simant (talk) 01:17, December 8, 2009 (UTC)

I believe Formation Ino-Shika-Cho is what it said it is: a formation used by Ino, Shikamaru and Choji. Basically this would be on the same level of jutsu if you know...it was actually a jutsu. Ino-Shika-Cho already does link to Team Asuma.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 02:07, December 8, 2009 (UTC)

MergeEdit

Should we merge the Ino-Shika-Chō(new generation) with the Ino-Shika-Chō(previous). We could just split the article into two section one for each generation. I dont know how to merge articles or if we can, but if you think this is a good idea than merge them together.Scott swag (talk) 03:38, October 7, 2010 (UTC)

How can we merge two articles when only one of the articles actually exists? ~SnapperTo 04:20, October 7, 2010 (UTC)

I mean like the formation Ino-Shika-Cho and their fathers version of it.Scott swag (talk) 04:33, October 7, 2010 (UTC)

But the two "versions" are fundamentally the same. ~SnapperTo 07:21, October 7, 2010 (UTC)

Problem Edit

There's no Yamanaka sign in the infobox with the others --Yamanaka Ino (talk) 21:36, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

Yamanaka jutsu aren't hiden so the symbol doesn't show up. ~SnapperTo 21:38, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

Dragon Ball Edit

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6W8sI88h9h8&feature=related

This link shows where Kishi may have gotten the name from, should it be put in the trivia?--—This unsigned comment was made by Kotoamatsukami (talk • contribs) .

From what I understand, both ideas were inspired by the card game

.--Cerez365^™(talk) 17:12, September 3, 2012 (UTC)