If there is an article on a character, who wasn't even shown for real in manga, shouldn't we create an article on Zetsu clone which was (presumably) killed in this chapter by Sakura and Shizune? He was more than in one chapter, attacked Neji, killed a bunch of ninja's in the camp, tried to kill Sakura, gave her important information and than autopsy on him gave another important information on Zetsus' origin? Because we are creating articles about nobodies from allied army despite having a general article on allied army, why not create an article on nobody from Zetsus' army despite having a general article on Zetsu Army? That Zetsu has accomplished much more that this F.Faust-RSI (talk) 15:10, July 5, 2011 (UTC)

But he is an actual character isn't he as opposed to a clone; The same goes for Tetsu. Whatever it is about them can be mentioned in the White Zetsu Army article. We're trying to ease of unnamed character articles especially since there's next to no chance that these guys will be named.--Cerez365 Hyūga Symbol 15:03, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
If there is an unnamed characters' disposal policy, than I agree. Although it's more about accomplishments, than about characters. Until we don't know for sure, if those Zetsus share one mind, we can't say they are just clones.Faust-RSI (talk) 15:10, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
There's no actual policy per-se since the forum on it died, but I really don't see the sense in creating articles for them when they're hardly differentiable from each other and will probably not have a bigger role than the one that Sakura pawned did when all that information can fit in a paragraph on the team article.--Cerez365 Hyūga Symbol 15:20, July 5, 2011 (UTC)