Talk: Rules

Revision as of 02:47, 14 December 2007

Heres a suggestion, don't be a jerk, only pages related to naruto,no personal attacks,no vandilism,cite your sources,basicly like those on wikipedia Random123 01:48, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry, I got a basic set in mind. I'm just waiting for the Forum:Names discussion to come to a conclusion. Dantman (Talk) 06:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Suggestion

You guys need a 1RV rule, but allowing admin discretion on when to ban in violations. I find the 3RV rule on WP ridiculous. Revert wars are bad, period. -Afker 00:34, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

While they are, I wouldn't want a 1RV rule, mainly because this wikia gets alot of vandals, which means alot of Reverting may be required. But I am not the authority, Dantman is.--TheUltimate3 00:57, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Anti-vandals would obviously be written into the 1RV as an exception. d-: -Afker 02:47, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:57, 14 December 2007 (view source) TheUltimate3 (talk \| contribs) (→‎Suggestion) ← Older edit		Revision as of 02:47, 14 December 2007 (view source) Afker (talk \| contribs) (→‎Suggestion) Newer edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:While they are, I wouldn't want a 1RV rule, mainly because this wikia gets alot of vandals, which means alot of Reverting may be required. But I am not the authority, Dantman is.--[[User:TheUltimate3\|TheUltimate3]] 00:57, 14 December 2007 (UTC)		:While they are, I wouldn't want a 1RV rule, mainly because this wikia gets alot of vandals, which means alot of Reverting may be required. But I am not the authority, Dantman is.--[[User:TheUltimate3\|TheUltimate3]] 00:57, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	::Anti-vandals would obviously be written into the 1RV as an exception. d-: -[[User:Afker\|Afker]] 02:47, 14 December 2007 (UTC)