Narutopedia:Sysop Requests

Archives
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7

This page is for users to request the action or attention of one of the Narutopedia's several sysops. If you require a sysop's assistance, please leave a request under one of the following headings and a sysop will get to it as soon as they are able. You may also contact one of the Narutopedia's sysops directly; a list of the wiki's sysops can be viewed here.

Note to sysops: If you have dealt with or intend to deal with an issue, please add {{Done}} to it. Please also archive this page from time to time to ensure the page is kept clean of completed requests.

READ FIRST!

Please check here to see what section your request fits into:

• Do you feel one of the wiki's pages needs to be protected from editing? Would you like to request that a protected page be unprotected? Is a sysop needed to modify a protected page? If so, please click here to make a protection request
• Is there a page on the wiki that you believe needs to be deleted? Has something been deleted that you would like to have restored? If so, please click here to make a deletion request
• Has a user vandalized the wiki? Does somebody continue to make certain kinds of edits after repeated warnings? Would you like a block to be adjusted or removed? If so, please click here to make a block request
• Is there an issue in the forums that needs a sysop's attention? Is there a forum-related action you would like a sysop to perform? If so, please click here to make a forum request
• Does a page need to be renamed? Please click here to make a rename request
• Any other request that doesn't fit one of the above? Please click here to make a miscellaneous request

Protection-related requests

• Gyūki - Edit warring. -- WindStar7125 (talk | contribs) 23:06, February 6, 2015 (UTC)
  • I see a sysop has indeed locked the page. Wondering where the verification of it being done is though... -- WindStar7125 (talk | contribs) 07:09, February 7, 2015 (UTC)
• Expansive Truth-Seeking Ball - User: Thebest423r and his/her sockpuppet account keep edit warring with others in order to insert untrue information in the article, i.e.: "A vast expanding mass of chaos with power to reshape the universe by obliterating it to nothing first," when it was stated to reshape the world. ^{(Strangely enough, User:Zkelvln also did the same thing months ago)}

★WindStar7125 01:09, March 8, 2015 (UTC)

• Boruto Uzumaki - http://naruto.wikia.com/wiki/Boruto_Uzumaki?action=history changing an unneccessary name of Boruto Kunoichi101 (talk) 00:42, March 21, 2015 (UTC)
  • Done Jacce | Talk | Contributions 06:55, March 21, 2015 (UTC)
• Sage - User: Narutofan92 is persistently restoring his/her edits despite others reverting them.

★WindStar7125 05:30, March 27, 2015 (UTC)

Deletion-related requests

For non-urgent deletions, please simply add {{delete}} to the page you wish to be deleted.

---

Blocking-related requests

• RexGodwin Constantly revert warring over a minor detail in this image for no reason, when nobody else seems to care. --Sajuuk _[Mod] ^{talk | contribs | Channel} 13:17, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
  • Obviously people seem to care enough if a on and off revert war commenced. Not to mention had a discussion went down I would have gone with his edit as Shikamaru's head isn't really necessary. This is more of a "A discussion should be had" and not "block RexGodwin for not agreeing with someone".--TheUltimate3 ^(talk) 13:23, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
    • Rex's sole contributions as of late is to edit war over the cropping of pictures. Considering he simply ignores other users and reverts without giving reasons, I would consider this vandalism and unproductive edit count boosting. --Sajuuk _[Mod] ^{talk | contribs | Channel} 13:29, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
      • He likes to focus on images. See no issue with that. Regardless, I would rather wait and see if he actively ignores discussions made then just block him outright. If you'd rather see what other sysops have to say or simply do it yourself (As I know you are capable of, so this little pony show confuses me.) is up to you. But my personal stance is, if he wants the image chaged or cropped or whatever he or others can bring up a discussion. Only when images are straight up changed for no reason (Like Obito's was a few months back) would images require this much hooplah.--TheUltimate3 ^(talk) 13:35, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
        • That is true, I will wait. And I only step in to an issue if there are no sysops around or it's blatant vandalism. Especially as this is in the file namespace, I would prefer sysops to deal with it first. (I've cleaned up the page, archived a lot of stuff and moved the header to a subpage) --Sajuuk _[Mod] ^{talk | contribs | Channel} 13:38, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
• Munchvtec - Acting like a kid every time things don't go his way, as can be seen here. His only contributions are constantly editing talkpages (despite being told by multiple users to stop doing) so he needs a timeout. --Sajuuk _[Mod] ^{talk | contribs | Channel} 14:21, March 17, 2015 (UTC)
  • Bumping for attention, also Munchvtec seems to have attitude issues by believing that he doesn't need to listen to editors unless all sysops tell him to stop doing whatever other editors are telling him to stop doing and also appears to be a magnet for trolls to come here and instigate reactions from him (because they know he will reply and not ignore them). There's also the issue that I reported to Snapper2 in which he seems to have an obsession with formatting every talkpage on the wiki which isn't necessary. --Sajuuk _[Mod] ^{talk | contribs | Channel} 14:28, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
    • SuperSajuuk has refused all of my questions as to what exactly it is im doing wrong. If he's talking about the formatting on talk pages then i also see no issue with me doing that. For the troll thing, yes i do attract ONE vandal but when he comes i kindly ask him to leave and if not then i rarely speak at all. He says that 2 users asked me to stop. those two users are him and snapper2. snapper2 asked me not to delete talk page edits to which i have not done since he asked. If all this warrants a block then wow. Munchvtec (talk) 15:35, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
      • You are going to have to give me more reasons than that. I have no seen him remove Talk Page edits, but if he was asked to stop and he did stop then fandidilytastic. In the discussion you did link, he did nothing wrong but to call one person for trying to dismiss his and Rachin123's opinion.--TheUltimate3 ^(talk) 15:43, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
        • I have asked him to stop going around talkpages and formatting them on a number of occasions now, because it is totally unnecessary but he believes that, unless someone other than me or Snapper2 tells him to stop as well, he can reasonably ignore the requests.
        • There's also the fact that he seems incapable of ignoring trolls and has been told quite a lot of times by people to stop doing this.
        • I don't actually see the user contributing meaningfully to the wiki, going around editing "ancient" talkpages just to format them is pointless.
        • I do believe that users have been blocked in the past (even recently) when they are showing no interest in listening to requests of other editors about their editing practices, I have told Munchvtec a lot of times to stop making pointless edits and he continues anyway, believing that it's fine to ignore editors if it's just the same ones complaining.
        • You can see some examples of the pointless edits he is currently making here: User_talk:Snapper2#request. --Sajuuk _[Mod] ^{talk | contribs | Channel} 15:52, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
          • Are all of my edits worthless sajuuk or are you only pointing out talk page ones. i do do other work. Munchvtec (talk) 15:54, March 18, 2015 (UTC)

(Edit!Conflict!Yay!)Further, if this is the formatting you seem to have issue with, then at least in my humble opinion, he should be commended for such. Yes it is not much and probably unnecessary, but they it is by no means a bad edit. In fact, having the section in the talk page properly titled and what not is a good thing and I would welcome him to continue if he believes it will help the wiki.--TheUltimate3 ^(talk) 15:55, March 18, 2015 (UTC)

• Also Munchvtec, as you can see I am speaking in your favor. Try not to undermine that by trying to speak for yourself.--TheUltimate3 ^(talk) 16:00, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
• Daniel Bailey. I already blocked him for being a sockpuppet and evading an existing block, I'm simply placing this here for other sysops to confirm if I am correct. His edits have included: junk trivia ("stating the obvious", which he did constantly on his main account), adding overly descriptive and sometimes unneeded appearance sections, despite being asked to stop, ignoring editor requests via his talkpage and being involved in vandalism. Oh, and there's the fact it's a sockpuppet account which he uses whenever his main one is blocked, which goes against the sockpuppet policy anyway. --Sajuuk _[Mod] ^{talk | contribs | Channel} 20:49, March 27, 2015 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

• I'd like any sysop to keep an eye on User:Kunoichi101. I don't think the reasons need to be spelled out in great detail, but I'm sick of her constantly making pointless edits. She has god-knows-how-many warnings to stop, even a recent block doesn't seem to faze her whatsoever. If she continues to make these edits, I would like a sysop to step in and just block her for a very long time. She ignores editors, she continues to make useless edits and she does not contribute in any way to improving the wiki. --Sajuuk _[Mod] ^{talk | contribs | Channel} 22:11, March 11, 2015 (UTC)
  • Honest question. What exactly about her edits are bad? I have never actually gotten the amount of aggro her edits.--TheUltimate3 ^(talk) 23:59, March 11, 2015 (UTC)
    • She is not contributing. Her edits are just minor little things that don't change the page's appearance. She thinks that she's doing it in the course of the manual of style, but the thing is... that's all she does. She doesn't actually improve the content, she just keeps making edits that violate the policy of "don't make edits that don't change the page's appearances".
    • As WindStar7125 pointed out, she has been told nearly 50 times to stop and not one of the 50 warnings makes a single damn impression: she continues despite the warnings. I would encourage you (or any other sysop reading this) to start at her first archive and just read through them all and you can see that she has, over the course of 7 years, received a huge number of "stop making X edit" warnings by literally tons of people (me, Simant, UltimateSupreme, Snapper2, Fmakck, yourself, the list goes on), which she has so far demonstrated she couldn't care about.
    • Honestly, she should have been infinitely blocked a LONG time ago, she does nothing more than harm the wiki with constant edit warring (in which she always violates Revert policy, ignoring talkpage requests and overall not contributing. --Sajuuk _[Mod] ^{talk | contribs | Channel} 08:47, March 12, 2015 (UTC)
      • Acknowledged. Gotta love my shoddy memory. Will watch more closely, keep my posted. But be sure to not make this a witch hunt. If you see faulty edits report them to me and I'll look into it, don't get into fights in talk pages that just means I can't do much.--TheUltimate3 ^(talk) 10:53, March 12, 2015 (UTC)
        • Not making it a witch hunt and I don't plan on getting into talkpage fights either with her, I will report every bad edit she makes (I'll also advise WindStar7125 and other active rollbacks to do the same). Don't see why we need to put up with it any more. --Sajuuk _[Mod] ^{talk | contribs | Channel} 12:45, March 12, 2015 (UTC)