This page is an archive. Please do not edit this archive, instead try editing the page this archive originated from. |
This page is an archive of requests from Project:Sysop Requests. The purpose is to keep a record of all requests, but without clogging the actual request page. Please do not edit this page.
- Sasuke Uchiha - Protection from moving the page due to vandalism. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 13:54, August 1, 2014 (UTC)
- Sage Art: Super Tailed Beast Rasenshuriken - Counter productive edit warring. Also, pointless edits being made to a comment tag for no reason other than to pad edit count. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 20:30, August 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Naruto Uzumaki's Relationships - Protection from editors who whimsically alter words in the article. Too many pointless edits. WindStar7125 (Talk) (Contributions) 05:13, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
- Will Materialisation - Counter productive edit warring. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 15:59, August 27, 2014 (UTC)
- Infobox:Madara Uchiha - To stop a potential edit war over Madara's "deceased" status. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 19:57, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
- Un-protect Naruto Shippūden: Ultimate Ninja Storm Revolution since apparently the entire game has been leaked[1]. --Questionaredude (talk) 06:57, September 4, 2014 (UTC)
- Truth-Seeking Ball - Can protection be removed, seeing as everybody seems to be on the same page about its component natures now.--BeyondRed (talk) 19:15, September 9, 2014 (UTC)
- User:SuperSajuuk/Custom UB, User:SuperSajuuk/Custom UB/Image Uploader and this: Author request. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 15:16, August 5, 2014 (UTC)
- Wind Release: Great Absorption & Parrot -- Talkpage discussion. Norleon (talk) 17:13, August 8, 2014 (UTC)
- These four screen-shots once this discussion is closed please. Norleon (talk) 12:17, August 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Koppojutsu - Fanon. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 17:24, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
- Snapper's userpage - No offence intended Snapper, but if we tell others off for not following Userpage policy, then it's only right that your userpage be deleted as it has nothing to do with the wiki and doesn't talk about you as an editor. I would use the delete template, but Snapper has had his userpage protected for years. He can save it from deletion by actually making it useful (aka, talking about himself as an editor, like every other editor is required to do to have a userpage) --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 19:30, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
- This picture. Unused and unnecessary. The current image we have of Nagato with Madara's Rinnegan is fine. Thanks in advance. --WindStar7125 (Talk) (Contribs) 00:42, September 1, 2014 (UTC)
- This picture. Unless used on a profile or talk page, please delete this unnecessary photo. Thanks in advance.--WindStar7125 03:34, September 6, 2014 (UTC)
- Done Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:41, September 6, 2014 (UTC)
- Six Paths Chakra - Talkpage discussion. Norleon (talk) 09:56, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
- The following pictures as they are unused or got replaced by png.-versions: File:3rdMizukage.png, File:Madara released.png, File:Hamura hagoromo sealing.png, File:The Seal Begins.JPG, File:Deceased kage summon.jpg, File:Six Paths Chibaku Tensei.JPG. Norleon (talk) 14:23, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
- This picture. Scanalation image, not allowed here. Thanks in advance. --WindStar7125 01:34, September 18, 2014 (UTC)
- File:Asura and Followers.jpg This one as well. --Vecanoi (talk) 01:45, September 18, 2014 (UTC)
- Done Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:50, September 18, 2014 (UTC)
- Vithuyan Akimichi, Andy Hatake, Ben Dover and Ryan. T Uchiha. Vandalism and fanon. Thanks in advance. --WindStar7125 00:59, September 23, 2014 (UTC)
- Done Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:20, September 23, 2014 (UTC)
- File:Tobirama using Hiraishin on Obito.png, File:Goshun Mawashi no Jutsu 2.png, File:Hashirama vs madara.png and File:Madara activating Susanoo.png please. Norleon (talk) 14:32, September 25, 2014 (UTC)
- File:Tobirama ambushes Obito.png. Image is too "bright." Low contrast, and difficult to perceive. Similar to how in the Six Paths of Pain article, some manga images were left there because the anime ones were too dark, this image has too much light. It is very white and blends in with the page. Please delete if unused. Thanks in advance. --WindStar7125 05:10, September 27, 2014 (UTC)
- User:Munchvtec - Userpage is more a personal biography of the user than anything about the user as an editor as well. Tagged it with deletion as well. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 12:52, October 1, 2014 (UTC)
- This image. Too blurry and too low quality. Also this one as well. User KirinNOTKarin uploaded it, but he and I came to an agreement that the picture I uploaded was better suited for the wiki. Thanks in advance. • WindStar7125 [Mod] 04:32, October 8, 2014 (UTC)
- This image. Fanart. Violates image policy. Hopefully this is an urgent deletion and I apologize for not using the {{delete}} tag more. Thanks in advance. • WindStar7125 [Mod] 21:50, October 8, 2014 (UTC)
- Done Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:48, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
- This image. This one as well. Also this. Fanart. Violates image policy. Thanks in advance. • WindStar7125 [Mod] 00:59, October 10, 2014 (UTC)
- This image. Bootleg scanalations are not allowed here. Thanks in advance. • WindStar7125 [Mod] 01:45, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
- Done, although I'm personally of the mind this wasn't urgent, per se. My definition of urgent is more in the realm of pornography and blatant spam. Fan art and scanlations should be deleted, yes, but they're not urgent. That's my opinion at least. Other sysops can have other views. Anyway... ~SnapperTo 02:48, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
- The intermediate revisions between the second edit and my recent revert (the second edit is dated 13:56, 8 April 2012) --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 18:16, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
- So I go back to look at the file and find Snapper did not do as I requested, instead choosing to remove all of the revisions and just restore a revision that was never necessary in the first place. I would appreciate that sysops do as requested and not just do whatever the heck they want when it comes to sysop requests. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 18:42, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
- I would appreciate you not be so insistent on being listened to and defensive of your own contributions. The new version has better colors and less pixelation. Your reasons for reverting it initially were in error. ~SnapperTo 18:44, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
- I would appreciate that when someone asks you to do something, you do as requested, not do whatever you want. I made a specific request and you didn't follow through with it. That is reason enough for me to complain about your actions to the image. And I would also appreciate you stop with the personal attacks every time you don't like being called out for your mistakes. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 18:46, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
- I would appreciate you not be so insistent on being listened to and defensive of your own contributions. The new version has better colors and less pixelation. Your reasons for reverting it initially were in error. ~SnapperTo 18:44, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
- So I go back to look at the file and find Snapper did not do as I requested, instead choosing to remove all of the revisions and just restore a revision that was never necessary in the first place. I would appreciate that sysops do as requested and not just do whatever the heck they want when it comes to sysop requests. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 18:42, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
- Bige1218 They have been adding false information on the Naruto Shippūden: Ultimate Ninja Storm Revolution page without sources almost everyday for at least the past month. Examples include adding unconfirmed playable characters, teams, stages, and ultimate jutsu. They have also started adding speculation to the new Naruto Shin Jidai Kaimaku Project page as well. --Questionaredude (talk) 18:10, July 23, 2014 (UTC)
- TheForgottenUchiha - Movepage vandalism. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 13:54, August 1, 2014 (UTC)
- Infinite.tsukuyomi - Ignoring talkpage warnings to stop violating Image policy (3 warnings given and still violating policy) --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 09:26, August 3, 2014 (UTC)
- Twelvethrower24 - Vandalism to Taijutsu. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 17:24, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
- Done —This unsigned comment was made by TheUltimate3 (talk • contribs) .
- 123zane321 - Spamming "I need to pee" in various threads on the forums. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 20:07, August 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Souhail.terrahi - Vandalism --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 22:08, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
- Done Jacce | Talk | Contributions 03:23, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
- Infinite.tsukuyomi - violating the Image Policy even after being blocked because of it.-- JOA20 09:41, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
- The user "Infinite.tsukuyomi" is probably another one of the 5 accounts blocked indefinitely previously for being obsessed with Karin. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 09:43, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
- Momochanx3 --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 19:58, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
- Disputed page protected instead. ~SnapperTo 20:11, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
- You might now want to consider a block, based on this repeatedly undone edit --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 20:36, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
- Disputed page protected instead. ~SnapperTo 20:11, August 22, 2014 (UTC)
- Elveonora has been insulting other members for disagreeing with him, treating everyone like they are below him, and even if the manga says he's wrong he doesn't admit it, so potentially vandalizing articles will become an issue. He has been warned for his rudeness before and hasn't taken it to heart.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 21:31, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
- ExplodingBeef - Inserting inappropriate content on a fanon article. Potentially an alternate account created by IAmBob. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 15:51, August 31, 2014 (UTC)
- Addendum to this blockcheck: vandalism to the fanon article. Doesn't this prove that we need more people with a sysop flag ? >_> --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel
- Done Jacce | Talk | Contributions 16:37, August 31, 2014 (UTC)
- Addendum to this blockcheck: vandalism to the fanon article. Doesn't this prove that we need more people with a sysop flag ? >_> --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel
- Alexribeiro.soares.7 - Spamming everyone and the wiki about a game that doesn't even exist, despite warning after warning to stop doing it. Indefinite block is advised here (Snapper originally suggested a year block, but it's obvious this user doesn't contribute, so indefinite would be better) --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | My Contribs | Channel 21:56, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
- I am not dealing with this guy anymore, since warnings don't work with him. Alexribeiro.soares.7 has violated the talkpage policy more than three times. He has also used bad language on another user's talkpage on top of spamming the wiki and has added a "Candidates for Deletion" tag on his page. Please, block him for a year or indefinitely. --WindStar7125 00:58, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
- Done I've dealt with him. ~ Ten Tailed Fox 01:15, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
- I am not dealing with this guy anymore, since warnings don't work with him. Alexribeiro.soares.7 has violated the talkpage policy more than three times. He has also used bad language on another user's talkpage on top of spamming the wiki and has added a "Candidates for Deletion" tag on his page. Please, block him for a year or indefinitely. --WindStar7125 00:58, September 15, 2014 (UTC)
- Uzumaki hugo - I may be wrong, but I'm suspecting this is another account used to create blank articles, similar to User talk:Lidia.barcelos.10 and a host of others I can't remember. If a sysop could look into this, I'd appreciate it. :) --Sajuuk Talk Page | Uploads | Tabber | Contribs | Channel 14:17, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
- 845933 continously adding info that is not needed even when warned multiple times Munchvtec (talk) 13:02, September 18, 2014 (UTC)
- Vitty698 and Vithuyan123. Vandalizing Narutopedia. Thanks in advance. --WindStar7125 01:09, September 23, 2014 (UTC)
- Done Jacce | Talk | Contributions 04:20, September 23, 2014 (UTC)
- Uchiha madara 79 - Large number of illegal, fanon image uploads. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 06:35, September 25, 2014 (UTC)
- Evilryu34 - Vandalism to Karin, Naruto Uzumaki and Sakura Haruno (potentially a sockpuppet for Karin obsessed accounts such as Emermbiemer and Infinite.tsukuyomi) --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 16:15, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Done. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 19:42, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Haxs - Disruptive forum behaviour: trolling, insulting/flaming users, off topic posting, repeatedly double/triple posting after many warnings. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 14:07, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
- Links to infractions welcomed. ~SnapperTo 17:06, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
- There are too many and they involve removed posts which I cba to find. As there's too many threads, I won't search for infractions that indicate he should be blocked. Should really pay more attention to the forums so you wouldn't need to be linked them ;) --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 14:10, October 6, 2014 (UTC)
- Links to infractions welcomed. ~SnapperTo 17:06, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
- Uzumaki hugo - creating blank articles, despite being warned at least twice.-- JOA20 18:26, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
- KenGhoul - Sockpuppet for ScottUchiha (admitted here) --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 21:05, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
- ^^^Um... yeah, bumping this request. He just basically admitted here that he was a sockpuppet.
- Edit: Well, before Sajuuk preceded to remove sockpuppet posts, he did. • WindStar7125 [Mod] 21:13, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
- ScottUchiha - Disruptive editing to userpage (ignoring constant warnings) and admitting to having a sockpuppet. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 21:59, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
- KenGhoul This is ScottUchiha's sockpuppet account. Both accounts can still edit their own talkpages and are violating the talkpage policy by removing messages from their talkpages. • WindStar7125 [Mod] 22:10, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
- I altered KenGhoul's block. I'll assume the auto-block (?) will have the same effect on ScottUchiha. ~SnapperTo 23:10, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
- If ScottUchiha is still able to edit after this, I'll notify you again. Thanks in advance. • WindStar7125 [Mod] 23:12, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
- I altered KenGhoul's block. I'll assume the auto-block (?) will have the same effect on ScottUchiha. ~SnapperTo 23:10, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
- KenGhoul This is ScottUchiha's sockpuppet account. Both accounts can still edit their own talkpages and are violating the talkpage policy by removing messages from their talkpages. • WindStar7125 [Mod] 22:10, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
- Yash2734959 - Vandalism to Uzumaki Clan --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 20:46, October 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Please close these threads. Sorry if ever there's a double link. Thank you!:
- Thread:120116
- Thread:120403
- Thread:120792
- Thread:121672
- Thread:121912
- Thread:121907
- Thread:121634
- Thread:122204-Not sure if this will be closed.
- Thread:122584
- Thread:121847
- Thread:122332
- Thread:122497
- Thread:122579
- Thread:122960
- Thread:123202
- Thread:122876
- Thread:122465
- Thread:122369
- Thread:122748
- Thread:123275
- Thread:122849
- Thread:123540-ItachiWasAHero somehow answered it.
- Thread:123976
- Thread:123885
- Thread:122825
- Thread:124021
- Thread:124203
- Thread:124302
- Thread:124886
- ~IndxcvNovelist (talk | contribs | PR | RLS) 11:36, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose — I don't agree with this at all and do not recommend it be carried out. Closing threads just because they've been answered or haven't been responded to in a while is an extremely bad move and will give the impression that nobody can have a discussion as someone will just come along and close their thread. The threads being open and inactive is better than closing them all. --Speysider Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 11:38, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not even going to hide how stupid I find that reasoning Speysider, but I won't close them then.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 11:43, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
- It may just be your opinion, Spey. I'm pretty sure others would not mind creating new threads. I thought you're encouraging others to have few threads with similar topic rather than to have a thread with over a hundred replies? ~IndxcvNovelist (talk | contribs | PR | RLS) 11:48, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Should probably amend. I won't close them, for now.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 12:05, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
- It may just be your opinion, Spey. I'm pretty sure others would not mind creating new threads. I thought you're encouraging others to have few threads with similar topic rather than to have a thread with over a hundred replies? ~IndxcvNovelist (talk | contribs | PR | RLS) 11:48, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not even going to hide how stupid I find that reasoning Speysider, but I won't close them then.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 11:43, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
- It does seem pointless to go closing threads over the wiki when they have already died.
- Closing should only be done when its just an announcement and requires no discussion or if the discussion seems to be going too off-topic or the like...~UltimateSupreme 12:25, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
- I think this script will work for us--~UltimateSupreme 11:49, June 6, 2014 (UTC)
- Thread:126207#47 - Leading nowhere and the OP is simply resorting to making pointless, off topic posts that consist of personal attacks against random users. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 23:20, August 7, 2014 (UTC)
- Thread:135607 - Thread is useless and serves no purpose. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 15:59, August 28, 2014 (UTC)
- Thread:139432 - Pairing discussion. Didn't notice it at first, but since it's got a lot of posts, requesting it to be closed to new posts (leaving it visible) --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | My Contribs | Channel 21:57, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
- Legit question: Why?--TheUltimate3 (talk) 23:49, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
- Pairing discussions aren't allowed, right? They're unnecesary. I think that's why. According to here. --WindStar7125 23:53, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
- Oh yeah. That thing. No idea how it ended as I just said my one comment and never went back. Well just to point out, if that thing is accurate shouldn't we also purge the "Sasuke" discussions as well?--TheUltimate3 (talk) 23:55, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
- According to that thread I just linked, I think so.--WindStar7125 23:57, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
- Oh yeah. That thing. No idea how it ended as I just said my one comment and never went back. Well just to point out, if that thing is accurate shouldn't we also purge the "Sasuke" discussions as well?--TheUltimate3 (talk) 23:55, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
- Pairing discussions aren't allowed, right? They're unnecesary. I think that's why. According to here. --WindStar7125 23:53, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
- Legit question: Why?--TheUltimate3 (talk) 23:49, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
- This is just a general request to all sysops: I would appreciate it if there could be more active monitoring of specific threads on the forums, specifically the new chapter discussion threads. They seem to be getting out of control with useless posts, pyramid quoting and illegal links/images. Thanks. --Sajuuk Talk Page | Uploads | Tabber | Contribs | Channel 18:36, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Thread:142140 - Doesn't need to be immediate, but I'll put this on block check, and will bump this request if the discussion gets too out of hand. Also, this I suggest this topic should never be brought up again. --WindStar7125 23:39, September 25, 2014 (UTC)
- Thread:142175 - Inviting pointless posts and arguments. Requesting it to be closed and not removed. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 11:02, September 30, 2014 (UTC)
- I would have thought a sysop would have seen this in a few days, bumping for attention. (would be so much better if I could just do it myself -_-) --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 13:49, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
- My understanding of popular opinion is that any discussion (so long as it relates to Naruto and isn't pairing) is a good discussion. ~SnapperTo 17:06, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
- That is true, but it has started to invite some rather bad threads that have left a sour note in people's mouths, which is beginning to cause some users to leave the wiki. Quite a few flame wars have started in some threads as well because of the lack of proper mod tools, but that's a discussion for another day. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 18:41, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
- My understanding of popular opinion is that any discussion (so long as it relates to Naruto and isn't pairing) is a good discussion. ~SnapperTo 17:06, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
- I would have thought a sysop would have seen this in a few days, bumping for attention. (would be so much better if I could just do it myself -_-) --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 13:49, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
- Thread:143992 - Obviously going to invite bad discussion / posts about how the wiki is wrong. This won't go anywhere. (Side note: I do like how a large portion of the messages here are from me and yet I still have no sysop flag. Heh.) --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 10:29, October 6, 2014 (UTC)
- Thread:145372 - Please close this thread. We have a user that's whining about how things are done here. This doesn't help the wiki in any way nor does it discuss Naruto. • WindStar7125 [Mod] 00:48, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
- Thread:144779 and Thread:144129 - The topics are finished and don't require further posts of any nature. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 16:25, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
- Thread:146233 should be closed, as it's just a duplicate of Thread:143670. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 14:42, October 17, 2014 (UTC)
- On a highly technical level, they aren't duplicates. One is asking about who is stronger, the other is asking who is more overpowered (which hilariously enough isn't the same as being stronger). So technically they aren't duplicates.--TheUltimate3 (talk) 17:11, October 17, 2014 (UTC)
Miscellaneous requests
- Okay, so I guess I would try this. Can someone update this page, specifically the Contact the Community? section? (May be optional though since this page is unused.) Thanks. :) ~IndxcvNovelist (talk | contribs | PR | RLS) 17:06, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
- This is specifically up to the sysops, but I'm requesting that Kind-Hearted-One and Aged Goblin have their rollback flags removed, as they don't seem to be active (their last edits were on 28th May and 30th June respectively) and don't appear to be reverting vandalism regularly enough to require the flag. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 17:17, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
- can someone make me a roll back user --Twelvethrower24 (talk) 20:25, September 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Phew... Okay. I have something to discuss with some of the sysops (and rollbacks/moderators/translators seeing this as well). I want to discuss some things in private (possibly the chat, in private messages). What I am wanting to discuss is for, in my honest opinion, the benefit of the wiki and the forums. Thanks in advance. • WindStar7125 [Mod] 01:41, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
- Discussions that concern the wiki should theoretically be a) public, and b) well-documented. I am not happy with this growing trend of secretive decision-making. ~SnapperTo 02:48, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
- That's understandable. I'll take it to your talkpage then. • WindStar7125 [Mod] 02:52, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
- Discussions that concern the wiki should theoretically be a) public, and b) well-documented. I am not happy with this growing trend of secretive decision-making. ~SnapperTo 02:48, October 13, 2014 (UTC)