FANDOM


Icon-Archive
This page is an archive. Please do not edit this archive, instead try editing the page this archive originated from.

This page is an archive of requests from Project:Sysop Requests. The purpose is to keep a record of all requests, but without clogging the actual request page. Please do not edit this page

Protection-related requests

Deletion-related requests

  • User:SuperSajuuk/Custom UB, User:SuperSajuuk/Custom UB/Image Uploader and this: Author request. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 15:16, August 5, 2014 (UTC)
  • Wind Release: Great Absorption & Parrot -- Talkpage discussion. Norleon (talk) 17:13, August 8, 2014 (UTC)
  • These four screen-shots once this discussion is closed please. Norleon (talk) 12:17, August 10, 2014 (UTC)
  • Koppojutsu - Fanon. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 17:24, August 18, 2014 (UTC)
  • Snapper's userpage - No offence intended Snapper, but if we tell others off for not following Userpage policy, then it's only right that your userpage be deleted as it has nothing to do with the wiki and doesn't talk about you as an editor. I would use the delete template, but Snapper has had his userpage protected for years. He can save it from deletion by actually making it useful (aka, talking about himself as an editor, like every other editor is required to do to have a userpage) --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 19:30, August 21, 2014 (UTC)
  • This picture. Unused and unnecessary. The current image we have of Nagato with Madara's Rinnegan is fine. Thanks in advance. --WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task (Talk) (Contribs) 00:42, September 1, 2014 (UTC)
  • This picture. Unless used on a profile or talk page, please delete this unnecessary photo. Thanks in advance.--WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task WindStar7125's Task 03:34, September 6, 2014 (UTC)
  • Six Paths Chakra - Talkpage discussion. Norleon (talk) 09:56, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
  • The following pictures as they are unused or got replaced by png.-versions: File:3rdMizukage.png, File:Madara released.png, File:Hamura hagoromo sealing.png, File:The Seal Begins.JPG, File:Deceased kage summon.jpg, File:Six Paths Chibaku Tensei.JPG. Norleon (talk) 14:23, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
    • To reiterate the message that appears when you edit this section: "For non-urgent deletions, please simply add {{delete}} to the page you wish to be deleted." ~SnapperTo 18:41, September 8, 2014 (UTC)
  • This picture. Scanalation image, not allowed here. Thanks in advance. --WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task WindStar7125's Task 01:34, September 18, 2014 (UTC)
  • File:Asura and Followers.jpg This one as well. --Vecanoi (talk) 01:45, September 18, 2014 (UTC)
  • Vithuyan Akimichi, Andy Hatake, Ben Dover and Ryan. T Uchiha. Vandalism and fanon. Thanks in advance. --WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task WindStar7125's Task 00:59, September 23, 2014 (UTC)
  • File:Tobirama using Hiraishin on Obito.png, File:Goshun Mawashi no Jutsu 2.png, File:Hashirama vs madara.png and File:Madara activating Susanoo.png please. Norleon (talk) 14:32, September 25, 2014 (UTC)
  • File:Tobirama ambushes Obito.png. Image is too "bright." Low contrast, and difficult to perceive. Similar to how in the Six Paths of Pain article, some manga images were left there because the anime ones were too dark, this image has too much light. It is very white and blends in with the page. Please delete if unused. Thanks in advance. --WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task WindStar7125's Task 05:10, September 27, 2014 (UTC)
    • To reiterate the message that appears when you edit this section: "For non-urgent deletions, please simply add {{delete}} to the page you wish to be deleted." ~SnapperTo 05:29, September 27, 2014 (UTC)
  • User:Munchvtec - Userpage is more a personal biography of the user than anything about the user as an editor as well. Tagged it with deletion as well. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 12:52, October 1, 2014 (UTC)
    • Munchvtec has "blanked" his userpage so this is no longer necessary. Side note: The user decided to call me an asshole. As this behaviour is exhibited many times by the user, I request a probationary block. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 13:19, October 1, 2014 (UTC)
  • This image. Too blurry and too low quality. Also this one as well. User KirinNOTKarin uploaded it, but he and I came to an agreement that the picture I uploaded was better suited for the wiki. Thanks in advance. • WindStar7125 [Mod] WindStar7125 Task WindStar7125's Task 04:32, October 8, 2014 (UTC)
    • Once again: "For non-urgent deletions, please simply add {{delete}} to the page you wish to be deleted." ~SnapperTo 17:06, October 8, 2014 (UTC)
  • This image. Fanart. Violates image policy. Hopefully this is an urgent deletion and I apologize for not using the {{delete}} tag more. Thanks in advance. • WindStar7125 [Mod] WindStar7125 Task WindStar7125's Task 21:50, October 8, 2014 (UTC)
  • This image. This one as well. Also this. Fanart. Violates image policy. Thanks in advance. • WindStar7125 [Mod] WindStar7125 Task WindStar7125's Task 00:59, October 10, 2014 (UTC)
  • This image. Bootleg scanalations are not allowed here. Thanks in advance. • WindStar7125 [Mod] WindStar7125 Task WindStar7125's Task 01:45, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
    • Icon-Yes Done, although I'm personally of the mind this wasn't urgent, per se. My definition of urgent is more in the realm of pornography and blatant spam. Fan art and scanlations should be deleted, yes, but they're not urgent. That's my opinion at least. Other sysops can have other views. Anyway... ~SnapperTo 02:48, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
  • The intermediate revisions between the second edit and my recent revert (the second edit is dated 13:56, 8 April 2012) --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 18:16, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
    • So I go back to look at the file and find Snapper did not do as I requested, instead choosing to remove all of the revisions and just restore a revision that was never necessary in the first place. I would appreciate that sysops do as requested and not just do whatever the heck they want when it comes to sysop requests. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 18:42, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
      • I would appreciate you not be so insistent on being listened to and defensive of your own contributions. The new version has better colors and less pixelation. Your reasons for reverting it initially were in error. ~SnapperTo 18:44, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
        • I would appreciate that when someone asks you to do something, you do as requested, not do whatever you want. I made a specific request and you didn't follow through with it. That is reason enough for me to complain about your actions to the image. And I would also appreciate you stop with the personal attacks every time you don't like being called out for your mistakes. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 18:46, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
          • The number of fallacies you're demonstrating is impressive.
            If another sysop feels SuperSajuuk's version of the file is superior, they can restore it and I will not offer resistance. ~SnapperTo 18:50, October 15, 2014 (UTC)

Blocking-related requests

Forum-related requests

~IndxcvNovelist (talk | contribs | PR | RLS) 11:36, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
 Oppose — I don't agree with this at all and do not recommend it be carried out. Closing threads just because they've been answered or haven't been responded to in a while is an extremely bad move and will give the impression that nobody can have a discussion as someone will just come along and close their thread. The threads being open and inactive is better than closing them all. --Speysider Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 11:38, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
I'm not even going to hide how stupid I find that reasoning Speysider, but I won't close them then.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol (talk) 11:43, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
It may just be your opinion, Spey. I'm pretty sure others would not mind creating new threads. I thought you're encouraging others to have few threads with similar topic rather than to have a thread with over a hundred replies? ~IndxcvNovelist (talk | contribs | PR | RLS) 11:48, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
Should probably amend. I won't close them, for now.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol (talk) 12:05, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
It does seem pointless to go closing threads over the wiki when they have already died.
Closing should only be done when its just an announcement and requires no discussion or if the discussion seems to be going too off-topic or the like...~UltimateSupreme 12:25, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
^ This. --Speysider Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 12:30, May 29, 2014 (UTC)
I think this script will work for us--~UltimateSupreme 11:49, June 6, 2014 (UTC)



Legit question: Why?--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō (talk) 23:49, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
Pairing discussions aren't allowed, right? They're unnecesary. I think that's why. According to here. --WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task WindStar7125's Task 23:53, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
Oh yeah. That thing. No idea how it ended as I just said my one comment and never went back. Well just to point out, if that thing is accurate shouldn't we also purge the "Sasuke" discussions as well?--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō (talk) 23:55, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
According to that thread I just linked, I think so.--WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task WindStar7125's Task 23:57, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
I haven't looked at the Sasuke discussions, but are they bad? I only intended to request the locking of the pairing discussion. :P --Sajuuk Talk Page | Uploads | Tabber | Contribs | Channel 09:32, September 15, 2014 (UTC)

  • This is just a general request to all sysops: I would appreciate it if there could be more active monitoring of specific threads on the forums, specifically the new chapter discussion threads. They seem to be getting out of control with useless posts, pyramid quoting and illegal links/images. Thanks. --Sajuuk Talk Page | Uploads | Tabber | Contribs | Channel 18:36, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
  • Thread:142140 - Doesn't need to be immediate, but I'll put this on block check, and will bump this request if the discussion gets too out of hand. Also, this I suggest this topic should never be brought up again. --WindStar7125 WindStar7125 Task WindStar7125's Task 23:39, September 25, 2014 (UTC)
  • Thread:142175 - Inviting pointless posts and arguments. Requesting it to be closed and not removed. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 11:02, September 30, 2014 (UTC)
    • I would have thought a sysop would have seen this in a few days, bumping for attention. (would be so much better if I could just do it myself -_-) --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 13:49, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
      • My understanding of popular opinion is that any discussion (so long as it relates to Naruto and isn't pairing) is a good discussion. ~SnapperTo 17:06, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
        • That is true, but it has started to invite some rather bad threads that have left a sour note in people's mouths, which is beginning to cause some users to leave the wiki. Quite a few flame wars have started in some threads as well because of the lack of proper mod tools, but that's a discussion for another day. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 18:41, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
          • If you are dissatisfied with the forums' current lack of topic restrictions, I would suggest making a topic about it. ~SnapperTo 18:48, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
  • Thread:143992 - Obviously going to invite bad discussion / posts about how the wiki is wrong. This won't go anywhere. (Side note: I do like how a large portion of the messages here are from me and yet I still have no sysop flag. Heh.) --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 10:29, October 6, 2014 (UTC)
  • Thread:145372 - Please close this thread. We have a user that's whining about how things are done here. This doesn't help the wiki in any way nor does it discuss Naruto. • WindStar7125 [Mod] WindStar7125 Task WindStar7125's Task 00:48, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
    • Seems legitimate at this venture. ~SnapperTo 02:48, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
  • Thread:144779 and Thread:144129 - The topics are finished and don't require further posts of any nature. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 16:25, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
  • Thread:146233 should be closed, as it's just a duplicate of Thread:143670. --Sajuuk [Mod] Talk Page | Contribs | Channel 14:42, October 17, 2014 (UTC)
    • On a highly technical level, they aren't duplicates. One is asking about who is stronger, the other is asking who is more overpowered (which hilariously enough isn't the same as being stronger). So technically they aren't duplicates.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō (talk) 17:11, October 17, 2014 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

  • Okay, so I guess I would try this. Can someone update this page, specifically the Contact the Community? section? (May be optional though since this page is unused.) Thanks. :) ~IndxcvNovelist (talk | contribs | PR | RLS) 17:06, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
    • I reduced the protection. If you have some idea about what to update the page with (as I have no idea), you should be able to do it yourself. ~SnapperTo 17:59, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
  • This is specifically up to the sysops, but I'm requesting that Kind-Hearted-One and Aged Goblin have their rollback flags removed, as they don't seem to be active (their last edits were on 28th May and 30th June respectively) and don't appear to be reverting vandalism regularly enough to require the flag. --SuperSajuuk Talk Page | My Image Uploads | Tabber Code | Channel 17:17, August 20, 2014 (UTC)
  • can someone make me a roll back user --Twelvethrower24 (talk) 20:25, September 19, 2014 (UTC)
    • Not at this time. ~SnapperTo 17:06, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
  • Phew... Okay. I have something to discuss with some of the sysops (and rollbacks/moderators/translators seeing this as well). I want to discuss some things in private (possibly the chat, in private messages). What I am wanting to discuss is for, in my honest opinion, the benefit of the wiki and the forums. Thanks in advance. • WindStar7125 [Mod] WindStar7125 Task WindStar7125's Task 01:41, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
    • Discussions that concern the wiki should theoretically be a) public, and b) well-documented. I am not happy with this growing trend of secretive decision-making. ~SnapperTo 02:48, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
      • That's understandable. I'll take it to your talkpage then. • WindStar7125 [Mod] WindStar7125 Task WindStar7125's Task 02:52, October 13, 2014 (UTC)