Wikia

Narutopedia

Narutopedia:Sysop Requests

6,013pages on
this wiki
Talk11
Icon-Archive
Archives

This page is for users to request the action or attention of one of the Narutopedia's several sysops. If you require a sysop's assistance, please leave a request under one of the following headings and a sysop will get to it as soon as they are able. You may also contact one of the Narutopedia's sysops directly; a list of the wiki's sysops can be viewed here.

Note to sysops: If you have dealt with or intend to deal with an issue, please add {{Done}} to it. Please also archive this page from time to time to ensure the page is kept clean of completed requests.

READ FIRST!

Please check here to see what section your request fits into:

Protection-related requests

Deletion-related requests

For non-urgent deletions, please simply add {{delete}} to the page you wish to be deleted.


  • {{Sharinganwiki}}: Created without consensus, talkpage appears to be going ignored regarding the matter. It's not used on any pages and should be recreated in a better format if it is necessary and with a consensus. --Sajuuk [Mod] 19:03, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
  • User:SuperSajuuk: Blanking userpages violates the policy. The page cannot be tagged because it is protected. Idrinktearsforsupper (talk) 08:17, July 8, 2015 (UTC)
    • It has a long page history and does not need to be deleted. Unless you want to have thousands of redlinks all over the wiki. --SuperSajuuk (talk) 08:27, July 8, 2015 (UTC)
      • Then consider this request as obsolete, I misunderstood the policies. Idrinktearsforsupper (talk) 08:45, July 8, 2015 (UTC)

Blocking-related requests

  • RexGodwin Constantly revert warring over a minor detail in this image for no reason, when nobody else seems to care. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 13:17, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
    • Obviously people seem to care enough if a on and off revert war commenced. Not to mention had a discussion went down I would have gone with his edit as Shikamaru's head isn't really necessary. This is more of a "A discussion should be had" and not "block RexGodwin for not agreeing with someone".--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō (talk) 13:23, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
      • Rex's sole contributions as of late is to edit war over the cropping of pictures. Considering he simply ignores other users and reverts without giving reasons, I would consider this vandalism and unproductive edit count boosting. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 13:29, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
        • He likes to focus on images. See no issue with that. Regardless, I would rather wait and see if he actively ignores discussions made then just block him outright. If you'd rather see what other sysops have to say or simply do it yourself (As I know you are capable of, so this little pony show confuses me.) is up to you. But my personal stance is, if he wants the image chaged or cropped or whatever he or others can bring up a discussion. Only when images are straight up changed for no reason (Like Obito's was a few months back) would images require this much hooplah.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō (talk) 13:35, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
          • That is true, I will wait. And I only step in to an issue if there are no sysops around or it's blatant vandalism. Especially as this is in the file namespace, I would prefer sysops to deal with it first. (I've cleaned up the page, archived a lot of stuff and moved the header to a subpage) --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 13:38, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
  • Munchvtec - Acting like a kid every time things don't go his way, as can be seen here. His only contributions are constantly editing talkpages (despite being told by multiple users to stop doing) so he needs a timeout. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 14:21, March 17, 2015 (UTC)
    • Bumping for attention, also Munchvtec seems to have attitude issues by believing that he doesn't need to listen to editors unless all sysops tell him to stop doing whatever other editors are telling him to stop doing and also appears to be a magnet for trolls to come here and instigate reactions from him (because they know he will reply and not ignore them). There's also the issue that I reported to Snapper2 in which he seems to have an obsession with formatting every talkpage on the wiki which isn't necessary. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 14:28, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
      • SuperSajuuk has refused all of my questions as to what exactly it is im doing wrong. If he's talking about the formatting on talk pages then i also see no issue with me doing that. For the troll thing, yes i do attract ONE vandal but when he comes i kindly ask him to leave and if not then i rarely speak at all. He says that 2 users asked me to stop. those two users are him and snapper2. snapper2 asked me not to delete talk page edits to which i have not done since he asked. If all this warrants a block then wow. Munchvtec (talk) 15:35, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
        • You are going to have to give me more reasons than that. I have no seen him remove Talk Page edits, but if he was asked to stop and he did stop then fandidilytastic. In the discussion you did link, he did nothing wrong but to call one person for trying to dismiss his and Rachin123's opinion.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō (talk) 15:43, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
          • I have asked him to stop going around talkpages and formatting them on a number of occasions now, because it is totally unnecessary but he believes that, unless someone other than me or Snapper2 tells him to stop as well, he can reasonably ignore the requests.
          • There's also the fact that he seems incapable of ignoring trolls and has been told quite a lot of times by people to stop doing this.
          • I don't actually see the user contributing meaningfully to the wiki, going around editing "ancient" talkpages just to format them is pointless.
          • I do believe that users have been blocked in the past (even recently) when they are showing no interest in listening to requests of other editors about their editing practices, I have told Munchvtec a lot of times to stop making pointless edits and he continues anyway, believing that it's fine to ignore editors if it's just the same ones complaining.
          • You can see some examples of the pointless edits he is currently making here: User_talk:Snapper2#request. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 15:52, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
            • Are all of my edits worthless sajuuk or are you only pointing out talk page ones. i do do other work. Munchvtec (talk) 15:54, March 18, 2015 (UTC)

(Edit!Conflict!Yay!)Further, if this is the formatting you seem to have issue with, then at least in my humble opinion, he should be commended for such. Yes it is not much and probably unnecessary, but they it is by no means a bad edit. In fact, having the section in the talk page properly titled and what not is a good thing and I would welcome him to continue if he believes it will help the wiki.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō (talk) 15:55, March 18, 2015 (UTC)

  • Also Munchvtec, as you can see I am speaking in your favor. Try not to undermine that by trying to speak for yourself.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō (talk) 16:00, March 18, 2015 (UTC)
  • Daniel Bailey. I already blocked him for being a sockpuppet and evading an existing block, I'm simply placing this here for other sysops to confirm if I am correct. His edits have included: junk trivia ("stating the obvious", which he did constantly on his main account), adding overly descriptive and sometimes unneeded appearance sections, despite being asked to stop, ignoring editor requests via his talkpage and being involved in vandalism. Oh, and there's the fact it's a sockpuppet account which he uses whenever his main one is blocked, which goes against the sockpuppet policy anyway. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 20:49, March 27, 2015 (UTC)
Seams ok to me. Jacce | Talk | Contributions 05:38, March 28, 2015 (UTC)
  • Javious.armani -- Ignoring the Manual of Writing Style Kunoichi101 (talk) 04:41, April 24, 2015 (UTC)
    • I'm pretty sure that sysops have told you that this does not warrant a block. Also, stop being so quick to report users to be blocked, unless they're obvious vandals. EDIT: I stand corrected. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 07:27, April 24, 2015 (UTC)
  • AngelOfDeath1395: I blocked him for being a sockpuppet for User:AngelOfDeath1295, based on the user's name. As with a previous block above, feel free to check and confirm. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 08:56, April 30, 2015 (UTC)
    • Leaving a record here that the user in question decided to harass me on my YouTube channel, demanding that I lower his block on the sockpuppet because it was apparently "harsh", despite being told several times that it would not be lowered. His messages to me simply confirmed that he made a sockpuppet account to bypass a block. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 21:49, April 30, 2015 (UTC)
  • RexGodwin Unnecessary and unneeded edit warring over pictures, despite several warnings to stop this behaviour. I have been told the user does this on every single wiki he visits and disrupts their communities by acting like the only pics that should be used are his own and he appears to revert war whenever people revert his unwanted changes. It has already gotten several pictures sysop locked in the past couple of months and I'm sick of dealing with him. Recommending a block of at least 3 months. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 08:38, May 22, 2015 (UTC)
  • Fairy Tail Dragon Slayer: continuously "raping" Sarada's talk page with his anger issues and ignores the warnings he is given, even by the sysops.--Omojuze (talk) 15:47, June 11, 2015 (UTC)
  • OmerAGilin - Spamming duplicate files, uploaded a fanon pic and ignoring talkpage requests to stop. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 13:36, June 14, 2015 (UTC)
  • ZéACNS - Ignoring warnings and adding false information in the articles.--Omojuze (talk) 19:28, June 15, 2015 (UTC)
  • Uranerd --Cerez365Hyūga Symbol(talk) 09:25, July 8, 2015 (UTC)
  • Paladin78 - repeated fanon information in articles, like here, |here, etc... (This shouldn't been done months ago.) Also, I know that grammar mistakes aren't ban-worthy, but from someone who is claiming to be from the US, it just boggles my mind. I really hope a sysop could do something about this, and as soon as possible.--Omojuze (talk) 19:28, July 14, 2015 (UTC)
    • I blocked him for the Guy edit after he made it. This most recent batch of edits seems motivated by an over-desire to document the myriad number of things that are "unknown", which at the moment doesn't seem a blockable offense. Will reconsider if he persists. ~SnapperTo 18:30, July 15, 2015 (UTC)
  • Paladin78 - Again he is adding speculation and fanon to characters and technique articles. He's been warned following his last ban and despite it, chosen to ignore requests about his editing habits and has continued adding bizarre things to articles. Warning him doesn't accomplish anything so could he be banned and for longer this time? --Sarutobii2 (talk) 20:29, August 25, 2015 (UTC)
  • XxSakura.uzumaki For changing Hinata's introduction with false reasoning over and over again despite being warned not to do it. Norleon (talk) 12:48, August 27, 2015 (UTC)

Forum-related requests

  • Thread:176952: Blatant spam/advertising. Please delete them (More -> Remove (give no reason) -> Delete (give reason as "spam/advertising"). Based on these spam posts, the user should probably be blocked for spamming/advertising.Would have done it myself, but circumstances... --Sajuuk 16:54, July 1, 2015 (UTC)
  • requesting thread 183847#29 to be closed as threat got off topic and users are insulting other users calling them dumb or misinformed —This unsigned comment was made by Actionmanrandell (talkcontribs) .

☀~~~~actionmanrandell~~~~

Miscellaneous requests

  • I'd like any sysop to keep an eye on User:Kunoichi101. I don't think the reasons need to be spelled out in great detail, but I'm sick of her constantly making pointless edits. She has god-knows-how-many warnings to stop, even a recent block doesn't seem to faze her whatsoever. If she continues to make these edits, I would like a sysop to step in and just block her for a very long time. She ignores editors, she continues to make useless edits and she does not contribute in any way to improving the wiki. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 22:11, March 11, 2015 (UTC)
    • Honest question. What exactly about her edits are bad? I have never actually gotten the amount of aggro her edits.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō (talk) 23:59, March 11, 2015 (UTC)
      • She is not contributing. Her edits are just minor little things that don't change the page's appearance. She thinks that she's doing it in the course of the manual of style, but the thing is... that's all she does. She doesn't actually improve the content, she just keeps making edits that violate the policy of "don't make edits that don't change the page's appearances".
      • As WindStar7125 pointed out, she has been told nearly 50 times to stop and not one of the 50 warnings makes a single damn impression: she continues despite the warnings. I would encourage you (or any other sysop reading this) to start at her first archive and just read through them all and you can see that she has, over the course of 7 years, received a huge number of "stop making X edit" warnings by literally tons of people (me, Simant, UltimateSupreme, Snapper2, Fmakck, yourself, the list goes on), which she has so far demonstrated she couldn't care about.
      • Honestly, she should have been infinitely blocked a LONG time ago, she does nothing more than harm the wiki with constant edit warring (in which she always violates Revert policy, ignoring talkpage requests and overall not contributing. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 08:47, March 12, 2015 (UTC)
        • Acknowledged. Gotta love my shoddy memory. Will watch more closely, keep my posted. But be sure to not make this a witch hunt. If you see faulty edits report them to me and I'll look into it, don't get into fights in talk pages that just means I can't do much.--TheUltimate3 Eye of Rikudō (talk) 10:53, March 12, 2015 (UTC)
          • Not making it a witch hunt and I don't plan on getting into talkpage fights either with her, I will report every bad edit she makes (I'll also advise WindStar7125 and other active rollbacks to do the same). Don't see why we need to put up with it any more. --Sajuuk [Mod] talk | contribs | Channel 12:45, March 12, 2015 (UTC)
  • Boruto Uzumaki: The page is blocked. Please, can someone add this picture in "Appearance" with the description: "Boruto in Naruto Gaiden"? Narsha | Talk
  • Add Sarada Uchiha as a member of Team Konohamaru, her infobox is locked from editing. Thank you.--Omojuze (talk) 11:16, June 24, 2015 (UTC)
  • Calling on the sysops to keep an eye on an editor. Based on this edit, they're likely to create a lot of redundant articles with no care for how we do things here. If they spam pages, I request the user to be blocked from the wiki, preferably indefinitely. They're just causing hassle for us and don't seem to care. --Sajuuk 20:10, July 1, 2015 (UTC)
    • Could something be done about Paladin78? All his edits are either junk or unsourced speculation. --Sarutobii2 (talk) 22:15, July 28, 2015 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki