Wikia

Narutopedia

Should we have wich chapter or episode the info is from and where should we put it

5,390pages on
this wiki

Forum page

Revision as of 20:53, December 22, 2008 by Dantman (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This Forum has been archived

Visit the new Forums
Forums: Index Narutopedia Discussion Should we have wich chapter or episode the info is from and where should we put it
Note: This topic has been unedited for 1945 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.


Ive just been going through some of the character pages but most of them dont say which chapter/episode they got the info from or which chapters/episodes theyre main fights ar on, i think the chapter/episode should be theyre so people can watch the episodes/read the chapters theyre favourite characters ar on. ShadowShukaku 19:52, 15 December 2008 (UT)

Even so, it would take too much space. But, now you brought up something, we need more articles on episodes so that we can have the best Naruto information ever. That would tell other people, hmm, the arcs would probably could give out a clue. All the jutsus are having their debuts, making it easier for people to find the jutsu of when it was first used. I think we're fine now. --Rasengan888 23:37, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

^_^ You know, with chapter/episode pages. There technically is nothing to stop us from listing what jutsu were used in what episode (annotating with SMW). An episode infobox could do that, and it would make for some very interesting queries. ~NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Dec 16, 2008 @ 00:09 (UTC)

Oh when we put in what jutsu was used in each episode can we also have wich characters appear.ShadowShukaku 20:51, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

I think there should be footnotes like in general wikipedia articles that point to the bottom of the page to document sources, and show which manga chapter or episode the information came from. that way if someone is interested they can find the info, but it won't clutter the main text. Futon_rasengan 15:37, 22 December 2008 (EST)

No-one really updates any of those, so an attempt do do that just ends up leaving bad information in the articles. We used to have a pile of those sections, but round now, they are missing sources, and list sources that aren't used, so I've just opted for removing those sections. Though, if you want you can always go around the wiki and stick ref tags on various pieces of information, that'll nicely populate the References sections. ~NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) Dec 22, 2008 @ 20:53 (UTC)
Advertisement | Your ad here

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki