Narutopedia
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
   
 
Wait, can I voice out my opinion? This is a good idea, but the problem is the infoboxes with 'anime' and 'manga' images. ~[[User:IndxcvNovelist|IndxcvNovelist]] <sup>([[User talk:IndxcvNovelist|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/IndxcvNovelist|contribs]] | [[w:c:phoenixrising|PR]] | [[w:c:rockleespinoff|RLS]])</sup> 08:36, June 15, 2012 (UTC)
 
Wait, can I voice out my opinion? This is a good idea, but the problem is the infoboxes with 'anime' and 'manga' images. ~[[User:IndxcvNovelist|IndxcvNovelist]] <sup>([[User talk:IndxcvNovelist|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/IndxcvNovelist|contribs]] | [[w:c:phoenixrising|PR]] | [[w:c:rockleespinoff|RLS]])</sup> 08:36, June 15, 2012 (UTC)
  +
::For the manga-anime difference, we could just put the manga image in the 'Appearance'.--[[User:Spcmn|Spcmn]] ([[User talk:Spcmn|talk]]) 13:53, June 15, 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:53, 15 June 2012

Forums: Index Narutopedia Collaboration Part I and II pics in infobox?
Note: This topic has been unedited for 4326 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.



What about this? Putting a character's Part I appearance (if they were in the first part first) and Part II appearance in the infobox? Now bring on a stupid reason why this isn't possible. --OmegaRasengan (talk) 04:47, June 14, 2012 (UTC)

hmmm... back then Star Blazer 5 caused this incident by using images which cause by breaking the image policy. i believe this is the reason. Kunoichi101 (talk) 04:49, June 14, 2012 (UTC)Kunoichi101

What about this? --OmegaRasengan (talk) 04:53, June 14, 2012 (UTC)

this is anime-only summoning beast. Kunoichi101 (talk) 05:17, June 14, 2012 (UTC)Kunoichi101

and somehow of course, this may be not like OnePiece wiki and Bleack wiki. according to the Star Blazer 5 user talk page from the edits section. Kunoichi101 (talk) 05:21, June 14, 2012 (UTC)Kunoichi101

Looking at the character's pages at One Piece Wiki and Bleach Wiki it does seem possible. It would be helpful to have that here though. -White Flash-(Talk)- 05:34, June 14, 2012 (UTC)
yes, true, but will the admins. agree with that? Kunoichi101 (talk) 00:54, June 15, 2012 (UTC)Kunoichi101
TheUltimate3 prefers just their original images. Keeps everything...simple. Especially because we have that little habit of having manga images when there is a discrepancy between manga and anime portrayals. This would just get stupid if we then decided to add Part II images as well.--TheUltimate3 Allied Shinobi Forces Symbol (talk) 01:13, June 15, 2012 (UTC)
Same as former.--Cerez365Hyūga Symbol(talk) 01:29, June 15, 2012 (UTC)

and there you have it. This discussion is concluded. 02:37, June 15, 2012 (UTC)Kunoichi101

TheUltimate3 is right — ¤ULTIMATE SUPREME ¤ (T@lk) 05:31, June 15, 2012 (UTC)

Wait, can I voice out my opinion? This is a good idea, but the problem is the infoboxes with 'anime' and 'manga' images. ~IndxcvNovelist (talk | contribs | PR | RLS) 08:36, June 15, 2012 (UTC)

For the manga-anime difference, we could just put the manga image in the 'Appearance'.--Spcmn (talk) 13:53, June 15, 2012 (UTC)