| Forums: Index → Narutopedia Discussion → Naruto Fanon |  Post
|
Note: This topic has been unedited for 6125 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
If any are interested in supporting and editing a wiki that is about fan-made Naruto, please show your support here at the Naruto Fanon request page. --Dubtiger 22:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
It's been accepted!
Thank you people for your support! The wiki has now been made! Please submit your Naruto work and help make this a fun Naruto Fanon site! --Dubtiger 00:40, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- I thought it was supposed to be something like a repository for Naruto OCs, and I could've migrated one of my own wikis (PBwiki based now with 100+ articles) content there, but you basically killed the idea by adding the rules on the front page.
- The first rule already says that characters cannot clash with one another. That's the heaviest limitation for a fanon wikia that I can ever imagine! There are thousands and thousands people drawing fanart, writing fanfiction and role-playing in and about Naruto world, and they all are potential contributors to your Wikia. How many do you think are able to describe their OC so that they are consistent with one another and completely independent? One? Two? I'd say ten at most. Ten in the world.
- The second rule states that some of the characters are reserved for admins. I didn't understand which exactly (you say "canonic kages, including akatsuki and jinchuuriki" which is most probably not what you meant), but it makes the whole Wikia somewhat of a private property with big NO TRESSPASSING sign all over it. For example, how can I describe my OC if he's from 40 years after the current manga events if I can't say which character is hokage at the moment? Asking explicit permission from the admin every time you want to contribute sucks.
- Given this, I can't even think of what can fill up that Wikia (except for your own content, but then again you state "do not expect many articles in the first months", meaning you are no planning to contribute). I'm really disappointed. --Radaghast 14:05, 13 July 2007 (UTC)