Narutopedia
Register
Advertisement
Forums: Index Narutopedia Discussion
Narutopedia Announcements Migrating to Semantics
Note: This topic has been unedited for 5669 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.


I'd like to start migrating to better use of Semantic MediaWiki even though we don't have Jutsu infoboxes ready yet.

Primarilly in the use of ugly categories. It would be nice from now on, if when tagging certain Jutsu articles, instead of the category tags certain semantic attributes are used:

  • Instead of [[Category:Tensei Ninjutsu]] use [[Jutsu type::Life Transfer Ninjutsu| ]].
  • Instead of [[Category:Fire Release]] use [[Jutsu type::Fire Release| ]].
  • Instead of [[Category:Water Release]] use [[Jutsu type::Water Release| ]].
  • Instead of [[Category:Wind Release]] use [[Jutsu type::Wind Release| ]].
  • Instead of [[Category:Earth Release]] use [[Jutsu type::Earth Release| ]].
  • Instead of [[Category:Lightning Release]] use [[Jutsu type::Lightning Release| ]].
  • Instead of [[Category:Ninjutsu]] use [[Category:Jutsu]] and [[Jutsu classification::Ninjutsu| ]]
  • Instead of [[Category:Taijutsu]] use [[Category:Jutsu]] and [[Jutsu classification::Taijutsu| ]]
  • Instead of [[Category:Genjutsu]] use [[Category:Jutsu]] and [[Jutsu classification::Genjutsu| ]]

Additionally we have an extra tag [[Uses kekkei genkai::...| ]] to tag jutsu that require the use of a certain kekkei genkai.

Also, inside of Character pages.

  • Instead of using [[Genin]] and adding [[Category:Genin]] to the bottom, use [[Rank::Genin]] inside of the | rank = row instead of the [[Jonin]].
  • ...
  • Instead of using [[Jonin]] and adding [[Category:Jonin]] to the bottom, use [[Rank::Jonin]] inside of the | rank = row instead of the [[Jonin]].
  • ...
  • Instead of using [[Sannin]] and adding [[Category:Sannin]] to the bottom, use [[Classification::Sannin]] inside of the | classification = row.
~NOTASTAFF Daniel Friesen (DanTMan, Nadir Seen Fire) (talk) current discussion Aug 28, 2008 @ 05:27 (UTC)
Advertisement