Forum:Homepage Upgrade?

Forums: Index → Narutopedia Discussion → Homepage Upgrade?

Post

Note: This topic has been unedited for 4372 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

So I know this wikia isn't really one for frivolities and unnecessary functions like blogs and chats but a couple weeks ago someone came here and changed the homepage to the new format that most other wikia have I think. Jacce told them to take it to the community but I haven't seen that user here since.

After seeing it I quite liked it and was wondering if the rest of the community would be interested in having it done like that granted that Simant gives the go-ahead on coding and it's not too much to maintain (like the latest episode and featured character— which looks like someone'll have to be editing the homepage every week). And we get to change some of those images ( '-') that the user put up there.

Here a link to what the user did.--Cerez365^™(talk) 11:10, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

---

I REALLY like the new design of the homepage. Current one looks really bland and uninviting. I definitely say yes to the new homepage :) --Speysider (Talk Page) 11:12, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah. After (months) of being stubborn, and taking a course in HCI (Human-Computer Interaction for those not in the know) a more user friendly homepage wouldn't be so bad. The one issue would be that poll. I don't even know how to set up polls.--TheUltimate3 ~Keeper of Lore~ 11:25, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Looking at the edit listed above, it seems very simple.

<poll>

Question here

List of answers

</poll> --Speysider (Talk Page) 11:27, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

My issue is the featured character, article and the one about the episodes. If there was a way we could write a command into that that would automatically generate them, that'd be awesome. Also instead of featured characters I think the latest manga chapter would be better there. As for the images being used, a better one for justu and episodes would be required.--Cerez365^™(talk) 11:34, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

I really like that homepage design as well. =) Skitts (talk) 14:28, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Is there anything wrong with how it looks now?--White Flash (Talk) 14:37, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

It's bland and very outdated, as though it's never been touched since 2005. The site would look more modern with a more modern homepage. --Speysider (Talk Page) 14:38, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

It actually hasn't been touched since about 2008 or so. The last time something new got put on it was the "Wikia's New Look" announcement which for the life of me I still haven't figured out how to remove.--TheUltimate3 ~Keeper of Lore~ 14:41, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

I realize that my say here (as one of the newer members) isn't that big, but I still would like to announce my opinion of this. I think the current homepage looks very bland and too "cold". It doesn't really invite the reader to take a peak in the wikia. The new suggested homepage looks very inviting and interesting! I don't think I would have started to read and watch Naruto if my first impression of Naruto was the homepage of this wikia. :P Derigar (talk) 14:45, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

@TU3 I think that may have been added by Wikia itself from a central control panel and everyone who still uses Monobook probably has it on any wiki so it's something you probably cannot remove. Although, the new Wikia skin is better than Monobook by a mile anyway. --Speysider (Talk Page) 14:47, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

We'll have to agree to disagree on that one. I personally can't stand the new wikia skin. But it would seem that's a non-issue as of now and let's get back on the task at hand. Which is, yeah I support a new homepage, and I agree with Cerez's suggestions with some changes to it.--TheUltimate3 ~Keeper of Lore~ 14:51, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Yosh, so with more people we'd just need to decide on the content and the images to be used and such.--Cerez365^™(talk) 14:55, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Content should be simple.The large thing at will have Characters, Chapters, Episodes, and Jutsu.

Followed by a "Recent Chapter" and "Recent Episode" based on CrunchyRoll's schedule.

Not sure about anything else. As per usual with me, I would like to point to that lovable child of mine that grew up quickly and kicked the old man to the curb (lol) The Bleach Wiki's main page for an idea. Hell let's also throw the Avatar into this because damn that show is awesome.--TheUltimate3 ^(talk) 15:03, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Also, stole the mess out of Cerez's sig...--TheUltimate3 ^(talk) 15:04, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

I was going to suggest stealing from these places as well lol. But... you know Ulti, our people aren't supposed to steal from each other ( '-') but sure, go ahead... there 100 other people here that did it e_e --Cerez365^™(talk) 15:08, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

We'd actually fit with the rest of the wikis in the Anime/Manga Hub by updating our Home Page to follow that format, if my random clicking across the hub is accurate. And I'm going to be playing with my sig for a bit until I find something interesting lol.--TheUltimate3 ^(talk) 15:12, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

See that SimAnt's all action.--Cerez365^™(talk) 15:25, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Seriously, I feel we'd crumble and burn years ago without ShounenSuki and Simant. Just decided to do something with Homepage and already Simant is working on code.--TheUltimate3 ^(talk) 15:26, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

I like the new design its much much better --EzioLover (talk) 16:04, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

The one thing I'm not sure that should be done: featured articles. Will we simply pick random articles? Will we make a discussion group that decides which articles should be featured? Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 18:50, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

If it's possible, you could have a list of content that revolves every day. I know that another wikia does this for their content. --Speysider (Talk Page) 18:55, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

I know onepiece wikia uses a random one and that they have a cycle one. I was thinking we'd either replace the featured article with something "different" or use something similar to them and just have it choose them at random since I'm not sure if we want the problem of having to "discuss" what article should be featured.--Cerez365^™(talk) 19:43, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

TheUltimate3 chooses the one with the least amount of work. So the random one lol.--TheUltimate3 ^(talk) 19:47, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

^This. Omnibender - Talk - Contributions 20:05, April 29, 2012 (UTC)